Vehicle Frame Side Rail Stiffness Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle body frame structures face challenges in simultaneously suppressing the movement of the front tire towards the cabin during an offset collision while maintaining the absorption of collision energy during a front collision, as they either allow excessive tire movement or reduce energy absorption.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle body frame structure featuring a side rail with a projecting portion and a cab mount member that restricts tire movement during offset collisions and allows deformation for energy absorption during front collisions, utilizing curved and inclined surfaces to manage collision loads effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If members are provided at the side rails to make it difficult for the side rails to deform at the time of a front collision, then movement of the front tire toward the vehicle cabin side is suppressed at the time of an offset collision, but the absorbed amount of collision energy decreases because it is difficult for the side rails to deform at the time of a front collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuppression of front tire movement toward cabinVSAvoidabsorbed amount of collision energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The side rail is divided into multiple regions with different functional characteristics: a first region (front portion) designed to deform easily for energy absorption during front collisions, and a second region (rear portion) with enhanced stiffness to suppress tire movement during offset collisions. This segmentation allows each region to perform its specific function independently, resolving the contradiction between energy absorption and tire movement suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the side rail are given different local qualities: the front portion has lower stiffness to facilitate energy absorption through deformation, while the rear portion has higher stiffness to prevent tire intrusion into the cabin during offset collisions. This local differentiation of mechanical properties enables the side rail to simultaneously satisfy both contradictory requirements in different spatial locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If the side rails are structured to deform easily at the time of a front collision, then collision energy is absorbed effectively, but at the time of an offset collision, the side rail deforms more than needed and the front tire may move toward the vehicle cabin side

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabsorbed amount of collision energyVSAvoidsuppression of front tire movement toward cabin
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The side rail is segmented into a first region optimized for energy absorption and a second region optimized for structural support. The first region deforms easily during front collisions to absorb energy, while the second region maintains sufficient stiffness to prevent tire movement into the cabin during offset collisions, thus resolving the contradiction through functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The side rail exhibits different local mechanical qualities along its length: the front portion is designed with lower stiffness to enable energy absorption through controlled deformation, while the rear portion is designed with higher stiffness to maintain structural integrity and prevent cabin intrusion during offset collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure effectively suppresses front tire movement towards the cabin during offset collisions and maintains collision energy absorption during front collisions, enhancing safety by balancing these two critical factors.

Implementation Method 1

collision energy is absorbed by the side rails deforming

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

the front tire contacts the projecting portion. Due thereto, movement of the front tire toward the vehicle cabin side is restricted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 3

the collision load that is inputted from the front tire to the projecting portion is transmitted through the cab mount member to the side rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce Transmission: Force

Data Source

PatentUS10407100B2Vehicle body frame structure
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10407100B2 patent drawing
  • US10407100B2 patent drawing
  • US10407100B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a vehicle body frame structure including: a side rail extending in a vehicle longitudinal direction and disposed so as to face a front tire in a vehicle transverse direction; a cab mount member projecting toward a vehicle transverse direction outer side, from a region of the side rail that is further toward a vehicle rear side than the front tire, and to which a body is mounted; and a projecting portion projecting toward the front tire from a region of the cab mount member that is away from the side rail in the vehicle transverse direction.