Vehicle Front Body Structure Linking Element Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle front body structures face a trade-off in energy absorption during frontal and oblique impacts with little overlap, as attaching reinforcing elements to longitudinal beams impairs the deformability of these beams, thereby degrading energy absorption capabilities during frontal impacts with no or moderate overlap.

Innovation Solution

The vehicle front body structure incorporates a linking element attached to the same attachment portion as the connecting element on the upper longitudinal beam, minimizing the impairment of deformability and allowing both the reinforcing elements and upper longitudinal beams to cooperate in energy absorption during impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If reinforcing elements are attached to longitudinal beams, then resistance to frontal or oblique impact with little overlap is improved, but energy absorption during frontal impact with no or moderate overlap is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to frontal or oblique impact with little overlapVSAvoidenergy absorption during frontal impact with no or moderate overlap
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment portion is segmented into a first attachment area for the connecting element and a second attachment area for the linking element. This segmentation allows both elements to be attached to the same attachment portion without significantly increasing the impairment of deformability, as the load is distributed across different areas. The segmentation enables the structure to achieve both improved resistance to frontal/oblique impact and maintained energy absorption during frontal impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the linking element is attached to the same attachment portion as the connecting element, then the deformability of the upper longitudinal beam is minimized impaired, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformability of the upper longitudinal beamVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The linking element and connecting element are merged by attaching both to the same attachment portion of the upper longitudinal beam. This merging approach minimizes the structural complexity that would arise from creating separate attachment portions, while still allowing both elements to function effectively. The shared attachment portion reduces the number of components and simplifies the overall structure compared to having entirely separate attachment locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3197750B1Vehicle front body structure
Publication Date: 2020.05.06 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • EP3197750B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The vehicle front body structure (2) comprises an upper longitudinal beam (10, 12) and a reinforcing element (14, 16) for reinforcing the wheel casing of the vehicle, said reinforcing element (14, 16) extending in a longitudinal direction substantially parallel to the upper longitudinal beam (10, 12), said upper longitudinal beam (10, 12) comprising an attachment portion (40), comprising an attachment area for attaching a connecting element (8) joining the upper longitudinal beam (10, 12) to a lower beam (22, 24) of the vehicle. The vehicle front body structure (2) further comprises a linking element (18, 20) joining the reinforcing element (14, 16) and the upper longitudinal beam (10, 12). The linking element (18, 20) is attached to the attachment portion (40) of the upper longitudinal beam (10, 12).