Vehicle Function Recommendation via Conversation Nuance Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional conversation-based recommendation systems for vehicles lack accuracy in determining user intentions, often recommending tasks that do not match the user's actual intentions due to reliance on last or most frequent keywords.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that analyze user conversations to extract intention information, nuance, and keywords, using a processor to determine and recommend tasks based on these factors, enhancing the accuracy of matching user intentions with vehicle functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional keyword-based methods are used to determine user intention, then the system complexity is low, but the accuracy of intention recognition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintention recognition accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the conversation analysis into multiple independent components: intention information extraction, nuance information extraction, and keyword extraction. Each component processes specific aspects of the conversation separately, then the results are integrated to determine the final user intention. This segmentation allows for more accurate analysis without requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds nuance information as an additional dimension to the traditional keyword-based analysis. By incorporating sentiment polarity (positive, neutral, negative) as a separate analytical dimension alongside intention and keywords, the system achieves more accurate intention recognition without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If only the last or most frequent keyword is used to predict user action, then the processing speed is fast, but the reliability of task recommendation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask recommendation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary extraction of intention information, nuance information, and keywords from the conversation before final task recommendation. By preparing and storing these extracted elements in advance during conversation processing, the system can quickly retrieve and integrate them for accurate task recommendation without requiring time-consuming analysis at the recommendation stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the extracted intention information, nuance information, and keywords are continuously refined based on their interrelationships. The system uses the extracted elements to validate and adjust task recommendations, ensuring higher reliability while maintaining efficient processing through iterative refinement rather than exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10850745B2Apparatus and method for recommending function of vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10850745B2 patent drawing
  • US10850745B2 patent drawing
  • US10850745B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for recommending a function of a vehicle includes an input module, a memory, an output module, and a processor. The processor obtains intention information indicating an action associated with each of a plurality of sentences, nuance information indicating a positive, neutral, or negative meaning included in each of the plurality of sentences, and one or more keywords for executing a function associated with the intention information among a plurality of functions embedded in the vehicle by analyzing each of the plurality included in the conversation, determines a task, associated with the function, to be recommended to at least some of the plurality of users, based on the intention information, the nuance information, and the one or more keywords, and outputs a message of recommending the task using the output module, when the end of the conversation is recognized.