Vehicle Function Sequence Schema Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle systems lack the ability to efficiently automate and individualize multiple vehicle functions, leading to repetitive tasks for drivers and inefficient use of available features, as existing solutions are limited in adaptability and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows for the definition and execution of vehicle function sequence schemas, which specify a chronological order of vehicle functions triggered by various events, including user-defined conditions and environmental factors, ensuring functional capability and reliability through a receiving, checking, and control unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple vehicle functions are automated with customizable sequences, then driver workload is reduced and productivity increases, but system complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver workload reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments vehicle automation into modular function sequences, where each sequence represents a discrete set of automated actions (e.g., parking sequence, security sequence). This segmentation allows the complex automation system to be divided into manageable, independently configurable units, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic configurability of vehicle function sequences, allowing users to customize, activate, or deactivate specific sequences based on varying driving situations and preferences. This dynamic approach enables the system to adapt to different scenarios without requiring a complete redesign of the automation architecture, balancing complexity with flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If vehicle functions are fixedly predefined by the manufacturer, then reliability is maintained, but adaptability and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration of vehicle function sequences during manufacturing with default reliable settings, while simultaneously preparing the infrastructure for user customization. This preliminary action ensures baseline reliability is maintained while enabling future adaptability through user-defined modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor the execution of vehicle function sequences and provide information about system state and performance. This feedback enables the system to maintain reliability by detecting issues and adapting to actual usage patterns, while also supporting customization as users refine sequences based on observed performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If comprehensive checks of predefinable sequences are implemented, then reliability improves, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesequence execution reliabilityVSAvoidvalidation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service validation where the automated execution infrastructure automatically performs checks and validations of vehicle function sequences without requiring manual intervention. The system self-verifies sequence correctness, detects conflicts, and ensures reliable execution, maintaining high reliability while avoiding the complexity of manual validation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If repetitive manual actions are required, then ease of operation is maintained for simple systems, but productivity and driver comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddriver efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple individual vehicle functions into consolidated sequences that execute automatically. For example, a parking sequence combines gear shifting, brake activation, and door locking into a single automated routine. This merging eliminates repetitive manual actions, significantly improving driver efficiency and comfort while maintaining operational simplicity through intuitive sequence selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11618398B2Control of vehicle functions
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11618398B2 patent drawing
  • US11618398B2 patent drawing
  • US11618398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and/or method include receiving vehicle function sequence schemas, which specify a sequence of vehicle functions in the presence of a triggering event linked to the particular vehicle function sequence schema, checking the received vehicle function sequence schemas, storing the checked vehicle function sequence schemas, and checking the presence of a triggering event, selecting a stored vehicle function sequence schema linked to the present triggering event, generating control signals for controlling vehicle function devices according to the selected vehicle function sequence schema, and outputting the generated control signals to the vehicle function devices.