Vehicle Following Control Using Driver Gap Preference Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to accurately and efficiently acquire driving preference values of a driver for follow-up traveling with respect to a preceding vehicle, particularly during transitions between manual and automated driving modes.

Innovation Solution

A control device for a vehicle that includes a memory device and processor to calculate driving preference values based on a driving dataset, using functions specified in advance to determine vehicle-to-vehicle preferences and control target values for acceleration, deceleration, and timing, leveraging machine learning for data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple driving preference values are acquired for more automated driving parameters, then the driving preference reflection accuracy is improved, but the learning complexity and data acquisition difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving preference reflection accuracyVSAvoidlearning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the core driving preference information by focusing on vehicle-to-vehicle preference values as the primary parameter. Other driving preferences are derived from this core parameter through the stored function, rather than independently learning each parameter. This extraction approach reduces learning complexity while maintaining comprehensive preference coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by storing the function relating vehicle-to-vehicle preference to other driving preferences in advance. This pre-established functional relationship allows the system to derive multiple driving preferences from a single learned parameter, avoiding the need to learn each parameter separately and thus reducing overall learning complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If driving preference values are learned during manual driving, then the acquisition ease is improved, but the learning efficiency and speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition easeVSAvoidlearning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being learned from multiple driving preferences to a single vehicle-to-vehicle preference value. This parameter reduction maintains ease of acquisition during normal manual driving while significantly improving learning efficiency, as the system now needs to learn one parameter instead of multiple parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a single vehicle-to-vehicle preference value is learned, then the learning speed is improved, but the coverage of driving preferences decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning speedVSAvoidpreference coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the vehicle-to-vehicle preference value serve multiple functions by establishing it as a core parameter from which other driving preferences are derived. This single preference value universally represents multiple aspects of driving behavior through the stored functional relationships, maintaining both learning speed and preference coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-storing the functional relationships between vehicle-to-vehicle preference and other driving preferences. This allows a single learned parameter to expand into multiple derived preferences, ensuring comprehensive coverage without sacrificing learning speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12565207B2Control device for vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12565207B2 patent drawing
  • US12565207B2 patent drawing
  • US12565207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control device includes a memory device configured to store a first function, and a processor. The first function is specified in advance based on a driving dataset for a plurality of drivers. The processor is configured to: calculate, in accordance with the first function, a vehicle-to-vehicle preference value of a driver according to vehicle-to-vehicle information and subject vehicle speed acquired during follow-up driving in manual driving; calculate, based on the calculated vehicle-to-vehicle preference value, one or more remaining driving preference values for at least one of acceleration, deceleration, deceleration timing, and acceleration timing; and execute, based on the calculated one or more remaining driving preference values, a target value calculation process of calculating one or more control target values for the at least one of the acceleration, the deceleration, the deceleration timing, and the acceleration timing in automated driving with the driver on board.