Vehicle Gesture Input with Haptic Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle control systems, such as touch screens and voice-controlled systems, distract drivers by requiring visual or auditory attention, leading to safety concerns and accidental system activation, as they lack tactile feedback and are prone to noise interference.

Innovation Solution

A gesture-based input system integrated with haptic feedback, utilizing a gesture detection device, controller, and haptic actuator to provide tactile confirmation of inputs without diverting the driver's attention from the road, allowing control of vehicle systems like navigation, climate, and entertainment systems through detected gestures and voice commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If touch screen controls are used, then vehicle system control functionality is improved, but driver distraction increases due to lack of tactile feedback requiring visual attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces haptic feedback as an intermediary between the driver and the control system. The haptic actuator provides tactile sensations that serve as a mediator, allowing the driver to interact with virtual controls through touch rather than sight, thus reducing distraction while maintaining full control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements haptic feedback loops where the haptic actuator responds to touch screen interactions with tactile sensations. This feedback mechanism allows the driver to confirm control actions through touch rather than visual confirmation, reducing the need to look at the screen and thereby reducing distraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If voice-controlled systems are used, then hands-free operation is improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to noise interference and accidental activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehands-free operationVSAvoidcommand accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple input modalities - gesture recognition and haptic feedback - into a unified control system. This merging allows the system to distinguish between intentional commands (confirmed by haptic interaction) and accidental movements, thereby improving reliability while maintaining hands-free operation benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system requires preliminary haptic confirmation before executing voice commands. The haptic actuator provides tactile feedback that serves as a preliminary confirmation step, ensuring the driver intentionally activated the command before it is processed, thus preventing accidental activations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If virtual buttons are used instead of physical buttons, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation worsens due to inability to locate controls by touch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structureVSAvoidcontrol location detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic actuator serves as an intermediary that bridges the gap between virtual buttons and tactile detection. It provides localized tactile feedback at specific screen positions, allowing drivers to locate and identify virtual controls through touch sensations rather than visual inspection or memorization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and intuitive control of vehicle systems by providing tactile feedback, reducing driver distraction and minimizing accidental activations, while enhancing user experience through haptic confirmation of commands without the need to visually or audibly interact with the control interface.

Implementation Method 1

provide feedback to the user in a manner that the user is not distracted from the primary task of driving the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaptic feedback: Vibration

Data Source

PatentEP2889723B1Gesture based input system in a vehicle with haptic feedback
Publication Date: 2020.03.11 IMMERSION CORP
  • EP2889723B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2889723B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2889723B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A system for controlling vehicle systems includes a haptic actuator, a gesture detection device, a controller, and a plurality of vehicle systems. The gesture detection device captures movements of a vehicle driver or passenger and outputs data representing a gesture made by the vehicle driver or passenger. The controller is coupled to the gesture detection device and receives a signal from the gesture detection device indicative of the gesture. The controller is coupled to the haptic actuator, and selects a haptic effect based on the detected gesture and sends a signal to the haptic actuator to provide the selected haptic effect. The controller is also coupled to the vehicle systems, and based on the detected gesture, the controller sends a signal to one of the vehicle systems to perform a particular action. The particular action of the vehicle system is matched with the selected haptic effect.