Vehicle Gesture Recognition for Traffic Diversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous vehicle systems lack the ability to effectively handle unexpected traffic diversions, such as those directed by pedestrians in situations like accidents or road hazards, as they do not recognize or respond to human gestures for traffic direction.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a traffic direction gesture recognition system within vehicles, utilizing sensor fusion and gesture recognition modules to identify and interpret traffic director gestures, allowing the vehicle to perform maneuvers like stopping or turning, and acknowledging commands through visual or auditory means.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current autonomous vehicle systems use standard sensors and navigation systems, then they can detect and navigate typical traffic conditions, but they cannot recognize or respond to unexpected traffic diversions directed by pedestrians

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAbility to handle unexpected traffic diversionsVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing sensor system is extended to perform multiple functions: standard navigation and obstacle detection, plus gesture recognition for traffic diversions. The processor analyzes sensor data to detect both typical traffic conditions and unexpected pedestrian-directed gestures, allowing one system to handle diverse traffic scenarios without adding separate dedicated hardware systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A gesture recognition module acts as an intermediary between the sensor system and the autonomous vehicle control system. This module processes sensor data to identify traffic diversion gestures and translates them into actionable commands, bridging the gap between standard sensing capabilities and the need to respond to unconventional traffic directions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the vehicle system ignores unexpected traffic diversions and returns control to the driver, then system simplicity is maintained, but safety and efficiency are reduced in dynamic traffic situations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSafety in unexpected traffic situationsVSAvoidLevel of autonomous response
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle system dynamically adjusts its level of automation based on the detected situation. For typical traffic conditions, the system operates autonomously. When a traffic diversion gesture is detected, the system transitions to a higher level of autonomous response by recognizing the gesture and executing appropriate maneuvers without returning control to the driver, thereby maintaining safety and efficiency across varying traffic scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle equips advanced gesture recognition capabilities, then it can respond to traffic director gestures, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveGesture recognition capabilityVSAvoidSensor and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is designed to perform multiple functions: standard navigation and obstacle detection, plus gesture recognition for traffic diversions. The processor analyzes sensor data to detect both typical traffic conditions and unexpected pedestrian-directed gestures, allowing one system to handle diverse traffic scenarios without adding separate dedicated hardware systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses existing sensor data and processing capabilities to create a virtual representation of traffic conditions, including detecting gestures as patterns in the sensor data. This approach avoids the need for specialized gesture recognition hardware by repurposing existing sensors and algorithms to interpret gesture patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10909389B2Traffic direction gesture recognition
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 APPLE INC
  • US10909389B2 patent drawing
  • US10909389B2 patent drawing
  • US10909389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Traffic direction gesture recognition may be implemented for a vehicle in response to traffic diversion signals in the vehicles vicinity. Sensors implemented as part of a vehicle may collect data about pedestrians and other obstacles in the vicinity of the vehicle or along the vehicle's route of travel. Sensor data may be combined and analyzed to identify a traffic diversion condition, including identifying a traffic director directing traffic using gestures or signs. Gestures of a traffic director may be interpreted and understood by the vehicle as commands to perform maneuvers related to the traffic diversion, including stopping, slowing, or turning onto a detour route. The vehicle may be equipped with a command acknowledgement device for acknowledging to a traffic director the vehicle's understanding of the traffic diversion condition or maneuver commands. Information, such as traffic diversion and detour information, may be shared with other vehicles and devices, or stored in a database.