Vehicle Health Code Broadcasting Across Mixed Communication Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern vehicles, especially autonomous ones, face challenges in detecting fault conditions in various components and determining appropriate responses due to the complexity of their systems and diverse communication networks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives and parses device health codes broadcasted over different vehicle communication networks, retrieves operational data, and generates control commands for vehicle responses, allowing for real-time fault handling and prioritization of responses based on current operational conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple vehicle communication networks with different protocols are used to support diverse vehicle components, then the system can handle more fault conditions and improve reliability, but the device complexity increases due to protocol conversion and message routing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidcommunication network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a gateway as an intermediary device that mediates communication between vehicle components on different communication networks. The gateway receives health codes from components via their native protocols, converts them to a standardized format, and routes them appropriately. This intermediary approach enables multi-protocol support without requiring each component to handle multiple protocols directly, thus improving reliability while managing complexity through centralized protocol conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the communication system into distinct layers: component level (health code generation), network level (protocol-specific transmission), and gateway level (standardization and routing). Each layer handles specific protocols or formats independently, allowing the system to support diverse communication protocols without creating monolithic complexity. The segmentation enables independent development and maintenance of each communication layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If health codes are broadcasted on multiple communication networks simultaneously, then fault information can be detected more reliably through redundancy, but the loss of information increases due to potential duplicate processing and protocol conversion errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault information detectionVSAvoidinformation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The gateway implements feedback mechanisms to track health code transmissions across multiple networks. It monitors which networks have successfully received and processed health codes, and can request retransmission if information is lost or corrupted. This feedback loop ensures reliable fault information detection while maintaining information consistency by verifying successful delivery before considering the transmission complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates standardized copies of health codes for transmission across different communication networks. Instead of directly converting between protocols (which may lose information), the gateway creates a standardized intermediate representation of the health code that preserves all essential information, then generates protocol-specific copies for each target network. This copying approach maintains information consistency while enabling multi-network broadcast.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the system processes multiple fault conditions simultaneously from different components, then comprehensive vehicle safety can be ensured, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring increases due to prioritization and conflict resolution requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidfault prioritization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different priority levels and processing qualities to different fault conditions based on their local characteristics and impact on vehicle safety. Critical faults (e.g., braking system failures) receive immediate high-priority processing, while less critical faults (e.g., non-safety sensor failures) are processed with lower priority. This local quality differentiation enables comprehensive safety monitoring while simplifying detection and measurement by applying context-appropriate processing rules to each fault type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification and prioritization of fault conditions as they are received, before full processing occurs. The gateway pre-sorts incoming health codes by priority level and routes them to appropriate processing queues. This preliminary action reduces the complexity of simultaneous fault processing by organizing work in advance, allowing the system to handle multiple fault conditions efficiently based on their predetermined priority levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11887409B2Device health code broadcasting on mixed vehicle communication networks
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 PONY AI INC
  • US11887409B2 patent drawing
  • US11887409B2 patent drawing
  • US11887409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable media for self-detection of fault conditions experienced by vehicle components, generation of device health codes indicative of the fault conditions, and broadcasting of the device health codes over mixed vehicle communication networks. The device health codes can be parsed to identify fault information, and the fault information can be assessed along with current vehicle operational data to determine a recommended vehicle response measure to one or more fault conditions experienced by one or more vehicle components.