Vehicle Ignition Control via Driver Identification and Communication Restriction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for encouraging safe driving behaviors, such as software applications that block text messages on mobile devices, are ineffective as they require voluntary launch and lack accurate identification of the vehicle's driver, leading to challenges in providing personalized insurance based on driving habits.

Innovation Solution

A remote vehicle starter system that communicates with a mobile device to restrict communication features during vehicle operation and identifies the driver, allowing for personalized insurance rates based on driving behavior, by ensuring the remote starter application is active before vehicle ignition and tracking driving habits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a remote starter system restricts communication features during vehicle operation, then safe driving behavior is encouraged, but driver convenience is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe driving behaviorVSAvoiddriver convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by requiring the driver to launch the remote starter application and obtain authorization before vehicle ignition is permitted. This ensures that communication restriction protocols are already in place before the vehicle operates, proactively preventing distracted driving while maintaining driver control through pre-authorized emergency communication channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The communication restriction applies different rules to different communication functions. General communication features (texting, social media) are blocked during vehicle operation, while emergency communication channels remain accessible. This localized differentiation maintains safety without completely eliminating necessary driver communication capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If the remote starter application requires voluntary launch, then system simplicity is maintained, but effective communication blocking is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcommunication blocking effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the remote starter device continuously monitors whether the application is actively running on the mobile device. If the application closes or is terminated, the system receives feedback and automatically prevents vehicle ignition. This closed-loop feedback ensures communication blocking remains effective without requiring complex additional hardware, using software-state monitoring instead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the mobile device's own operating system and application runtime state to enforce communication blocking. Rather than requiring separate dedicated hardware or complex external systems, the solution leverages the self-service capabilities of the existing mobile device to determine whether communication restrictions should be active, maintaining simplicity while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If conventional vehicle insurance is provided based on vehicle rather than driver, then insurance administration is simplified, but personalized risk assessment is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsurance administrationVSAvoiddriver identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The remote starter application serves multiple functions: it acts as both a vehicle ignition control mechanism and a driver identification system. By requiring the same authenticated user to consistently launch and operate the application for vehicle startup, the system universally applies user identification across both vehicle control and insurance assessment, enabling personalized insurance without requiring separate identification systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the vehicle ignition authorization process with the driver identification process. The same authentication credentials and user account that control vehicle startup also serve as the basis for insurance risk assessment. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate driver identification systems, simplifying insurance administration while enabling precise driver-based risk measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11676213B1Vehicle ignition control
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11676213B1 patent drawing
  • US11676213B1 patent drawing
  • US11676213B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of encouraging safe driving of a vehicle using a vehicle ignition control is provided. Ignition of the vehicle is prevented until an indication that vehicle insurance for operating the vehicle has been purchased. The insurance rate to charge may be based on driving behaviors detected while operating the vehicle.