Autonomous Vehicle Image Filtering for Cooperative Object Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for finding missing pets are inefficient, relying on manual searches and preregistering unique traits in databases, which can be time-consuming and limited in scope.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing autonomous vehicles to passively search for specific objects by filtering images based on user-provided characteristics, allowing multiple vehicles to cooperatively scan large areas for the object and transmit relevant images to the user for identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual searching methods are used to find missing pets, then the search process can be performed with simple equipment, but the search efficiency and area coverage are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle system performs multiple functions: it conducts object searches, captures images, transmits data, and navigates autonomously. This multi-functional approach replaces multiple separate tools (manual search, cameras, databases) with a single integrated system, thereby improving search efficiency without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicles operate independently to perform search tasks. They autonomously navigate, capture images of potential objects, and transmit data without requiring continuous human intervention. This self-service capability significantly improves search productivity while keeping the operational complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If a database system with unique traits is used to identify pets, then identification can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and requires third-party involvement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-registers objects in the environment with their unique characteristics before the search begins. When a search is initiated, the autonomous vehicles can immediately compare captured images against the pre-established database, eliminating the need for time-consuming on-site identification processes and reducing overall search time while maintaining identification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual process of third-party identification is replaced with an automated image recognition and comparison system. The autonomous vehicles capture images and the system automatically compares them against the database using computational algorithms, substituting the mechanical/manual identification process with an automated electronic system that operates faster and with consistent accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Area of stationary object

If autonomous vehicles are deployed to search for objects, then the search area coverage and efficiency are improved, but the system complexity and image filtering requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch area coverageVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing task is divided into multiple stages: initial filtering by the autonomous vehicle based on basic characteristics, followed by more detailed analysis and comparison by the central system. This segmentation of the image processing workload allows the autonomous vehicles to cover large areas efficiently while managing the complexity of image analysis through distributed processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The central computing system acts as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicles and the final identification result. It receives images from multiple vehicles, performs centralized filtering and comparison against the database, and manages the overall search coordination. This intermediary role helps manage system complexity by centralizing the most computationally intensive tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11163820B1Object search service employing an autonomous vehicle fleet
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11163820B1 patent drawing
  • US11163820B1 patent drawing
  • US11163820B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system that can receive an object search request from a user indicating a request to search for a specific object in an area traversed by one or more autonomous vehicle. The object search request can include a set of physical characteristics of the specific object. The computing system can then transmit a signal to an autonomous vehicle indicating a request for the autonomous vehicle to search for the specific object. The signal can cause the autonomous vehicle to transmit an image, selected based on a physical characteristic of the object, to the computing system. The computing system can then generate a score indicative of a difference between one or more physical characteristic of the object in the image and the specific object. The computing system can then selectively transmit the image to a mobile device operated by the user based on the score.