Vehicle Image Data Path Selection for Cost and Delay Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack an efficient mechanism to dynamically select the optimal communication path for vehicles to transmit image capturing data, considering factors like cost, communication quality, and delay, which affects the reliability and efficiency of image data transmission.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that receives image data requests, specifies the relevant vehicle and determines the best communication path for data transmission based on network connectivity, quality, and user type, and transmits these parameters to the vehicle, allowing for cost-effective and low-latency data transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vehicle uses multiple communication paths to transmit image capturing data, then communication reliability is improved, but communication cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication path complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes communication path parameters by selecting different communication paths based on real-time conditions. The information processing apparatus specifies parameter concerning communication path (such as path selection, transmission power, modulation scheme) according to communication quality and cost, allowing the vehicle to adapt to varying network conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The communication path selection is made dynamic rather than static. The system continuously monitors communication quality and cost parameters, and automatically adjusts the selected communication path in real-time. This dynamic adaptation ensures reliable data transmission while optimizing cost efficiency without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the vehicle transmits image capturing data using high-quality communication paths, then communication quality is improved, but transmission cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidcommunication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the trade-off between communication quality and cost by dynamically adjusting transmission parameters. The information processing apparatus specifies parameter concerning communication path based on both communication quality metrics and cost considerations, enabling the vehicle to select the most cost-effective path that still meets quality requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by selecting communication paths that provide sufficient (but not excessive) quality for the specific transmission needs. Rather than always using the highest quality path, the system chooses the appropriate level of communication quality needed, reducing cost while maintaining adequate performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If the system specifies communication path parameters in advance, then transmission delay is reduced, but adaptability to changing network conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission delayVSAvoidnetwork condition adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The information processing apparatus performs preliminary action by pre-specifying parameter concerning communication path based on current network conditions. This advance specification reduces transmission delay by having parameters ready before data transmission begins, while the system maintains adaptability by updating these specifications as network conditions change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the information processing apparatus continuously monitors communication conditions and adjusts the specified parameters accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that while parameters are specified in advance to reduce delay, they remain adaptable to changing network conditions through continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12028648B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method therefor, and computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12028648B2 patent drawing
  • US12028648B2 patent drawing
  • US12028648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus, the information processing apparatus executing an information processing method comprising: receiving a request of image data from an external terminal; specifying, based on the request, a vehicle that provides image capturing data to generate the image data; specifying a parameter concerning a communication path to be used by the specified vehicle to transmit the image capturing data to the information processing apparatus; and transmitting the specified parameter to the specified vehicle.