Vehicle Impact Detection Grid for Parked Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively detect and mitigate low-speed, low-probability vehicle impacts by combining sensor data from multiple modalities to enhance accuracy and reliability, particularly for parked and unoccupied vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A virtual sensing grid system that integrates data from optical, ultrasonic, and radar sensors to determine the location and velocity of moving objects, using a Kalman filter for trajectory prediction and a control barrier function to assess threat levels, enabling proactive vehicle control to reduce impact probability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a vehicle is parked or unoccupied, then energy consumption is reduced and the vehicle is stationary, but the vehicle cannot take evasive actions to avoid low-speed impacts from moving objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcollision avoidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle system performs self-protection by automatically detecting moving objects and executing evasive maneuvers without human intervention. The system monitors the environment using sensors, determines threat levels based on object trajectories, and autonomously controls vehicle movements to avoid collisions, enabling the parked vehicle to protect itself independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and assessment of potential threats before actual impact occurs. By continuously monitoring the environment and predicting trajectories of moving objects, the system prepares and executes evasive actions in advance, preventing collisions before they happen rather than reacting after impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple sensors are used to detect moving objects, then detection accuracy and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines data from multiple sensors (cameras, LIDAR, radar, ultrasonic sensors) into a unified detection framework. By merging sensor inputs and processing them through a common threat assessment algorithm, the system achieves reliable detection of moving objects while avoiding the complexity of managing separate independent sensor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to perform multiple functions: detecting moving objects, determining their trajectories, assessing threat levels, and providing input for evasive maneuvers. This multi-functional approach allows a single integrated sensor system to replace multiple specialized systems, reducing overall complexity while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12617393B2System for detecting moving objects
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12617393B2 patent drawing
  • US12617393B2 patent drawing
  • US12617393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer that includes a processor and a memory, the memory including instructions executable by the processor to determine a location and a trajectory of a moving object with respect to a stationary vehicle based on one or more first stationary vehicle sensors. A threat level can be determined based on the location and the trajectory of the moving object, and a control barrier function. Based on the threat level, the stationary vehicle can be operated to move the stationary vehicle to reduce a probability of impact between the stationary vehicle and the moving object.