Autonomous Vehicle Lane-Exit Detection Using 3D Road Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current smart vehicle technologies face challenges in efficiently navigating roads, detecting road boundaries, and maintaining safety due to limitations in sensor range and occlusion, as well as in addressing driver attentiveness and emergency situations effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a smart vehicle system that uses a combination of cameras, lidar, radar, and neural networks for real-time 3D mapping and object detection, along with IoT sensors for vehicle-to-vehicle communication and driver monitoring, enabling autonomous navigation, lane detection, and emergency response protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a combination of cameras, lidar, radar, and neural networks is used for real-time 3D mapping and object detection, then navigation efficiency and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex sensing and processing task into separate functional modules: cameras for visual detection, lidar for depth mapping, radar for motion detection, and neural networks for data fusion and object recognition. Each component operates independently but contributes to the overall navigation and safety system, making the complex system manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The smart vehicle system integrates multiple sensing modalities (camera, lidar, radar) and processing techniques (traditional algorithms, neural networks) into a single multi-functional platform that performs both 3D mapping and object detection tasks simultaneously, reducing the need for separate dedicated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If multiple sensors and processing systems are integrated for autonomous navigation, then navigation efficiency is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoiduse of energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs sensor data acquisition and processing at optimized intervals rather than continuously, reducing energy consumption while maintaining navigation efficiency. The neural networks process data in discrete frames and update navigation decisions periodically based on changing environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of processing intensity based on environmental conditions and navigation needs, using full sensor arrays and complex neural network processing only when necessary for safety-critical decisions, while using simpler processing during stable, low-risk conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If lane information becomes unavailable or unreliable, maintaining relative position using 3D model and estimated paths improves reliability, but measurement precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-builds detailed 3D models of the road environment and lane structures before navigation begins. When lane information becomes unavailable during operation, these pre-established models provide a fallback reference framework that maintains basic navigation reliability, cushioning against the loss of real-time lane detection data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D road model serves as an intermediary reference system between the vehicle and the physical road environment. When direct lane detection fails, the system uses this intermediate 3D representation combined with estimated vehicle paths to maintain position awareness, acting as a mediator when direct sensing is unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enhances navigation efficiency, improves safety by maintaining vehicle position and detecting obstacles, and ensures driver safety through attentive monitoring and emergency interventions, such as ejecting the driver in imminent collision scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

capturing images of the road using a camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

applying a trained neural network to detect street signs, cross walks, obstacles, or bike lanes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeural network processing:

Data Source

PatentUS20240317254A1Smart vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 TRAN HA Q
  • US20240317254A1 patent drawing
  • US20240317254A1 patent drawing
  • US20240317254A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Smart car method for autonomous navigation by creating a 3D model based on outputs of the camera and sensor, accessing a high definition map database and generating a trip with travel segments from origin to destination; detecting a freeway entrance or an exit lane based on a road marking using a camera and a sensor, if the travel segment passes the freeway entrance or exit, then follow the current lane without exiting; and otherwise following the freeway entrance or exit.