Vehicle Lock with Pull-In Device for Manual Opening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle locks for agricultural and construction machines do not allow for manual opening while maintaining normal locking functionality, and their locking mechanism can be impaired by the closing device, especially in case of failure.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle lock with a single rotary latch assembly and a closing device that includes a drive wheel and locking pawl, allowing for manual opening and automatic closing, with a trigger mechanism and sensors to ensure the locking function is not compromised even if the closing device fails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a closing device with drive motor and transmission is added to automatically close the lock from pre-latching to final-latching position, then the automation level and convenience are improved, but the device complexity and potential points of failure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic closing functionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closing device is segmented into functionally independent components: drive motor, transmission mechanism with two planetary stages, drive wheel, and locking pawl. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies maintenance while maintaining the automated closing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission mechanism incorporates a dynamic locking pawl that can engage and disengage from the drive wheel. This dynamic element allows the system to switch between automated closing mode and manual opening mode, providing adaptability while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a locking pawl and transmission mechanism are integrated into the closing device, then the automatic closing reliability is improved, but the risk that the closing device impairs the normal locking function increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking function reliabilityVSAvoidpotential impairment of locking function
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pawl is designed to engage the drive wheel in advance during normal locking operations, ensuring the transmission mechanism is ready for automated closing. This preliminary engagement ensures reliable locking while preparing the system for potential automated closing activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The drive wheel serves as an intermediary element between the locking mechanism and the closing device. It transmits force from the locking pawl during normal operation and from the motor during automated closing, while the locking pawl itself acts as a mediator that can disengage to prevent interference with manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the locking pawl is designed to lock the drive wheel in the transmission, then the automatic closing precision is improved, but the manual operability of the lock may be restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching position precisionVSAvoidmanual opening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pawl is designed as a dynamic component that can engage with the drive wheel's locking surface to achieve precise latching positions during automated closing, but can be easily disengaged by applying force in the opening direction. This dynamic design allows the system to switch between precision locking mode and manual operation mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of designing a complex release mechanism for the locking pawl, the system uses inversion: the locking pawl naturally engages through spring force or gravity during automated closing, but manual opening simply requires overcoming this engagement force in the opposite direction, simplifying the release mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS11965365B2Vehicle lock with pull-in device and vehicle with such a vehicle lock
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 D LA PORTE SOHNE
  • US11965365B2 patent drawing
  • US11965365B2 patent drawing
  • US11965365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a vehicle lock (1) including a rotary latch assembly (2) and a closing device (3) for the locking and closing of doors or hatches of motor vehicles, in particular of doors or hatches of agricultural machines, such as, for example, tractors, or of construction machines, as well as a vehicle including such a vehicle lock (1).