Vehicle Lock Control via Wheel Status Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the context of vehicle sharing services, there is a need for a system that can safely and conveniently lock vehicles without causing sudden stops, which could lead to traffic accidents, especially when users forget to lock the vehicle or remotely lock it while it is in motion.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a control device and a wheel status detection unit that determines the status of the vehicle's wheel, only executing a locking instruction when the wheel is in a static state, using speed sensors and a timer to ensure the vehicle is not in motion before locking, and including a central controller for sending locking or unlocking instructions directly to the lock.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If remote locking control is implemented for shared vehicles, then user convenience is improved, but safety deteriorates due to risk of traffic accidents when vehicle is in motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidtraffic accident risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of wheel status (motion or static) before executing the locking instruction. The control device queries the wheel status detection unit to determine whether the wheel is in motion or static state, and only executes locking when the wheel is confirmed to be static, thereby preventing accidents before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where the control device continuously monitors wheel status through the wheel status detection unit. The detection result (motion or static) is fed back to the control device, which uses this information to decide whether to execute locking, creating a closed-loop safety mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If wheel status detection is performed repeatedly to ensure safety, then accident prevention is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel status detection unit serves multiple functions: it detects wheel motion status, provides feedback to the control device, and enables the control device to make informed locking decisions. This multi-functional design reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel status detection unit acts as an intermediary between the control device and the locking mechanism. It provides critical status information that mediates the decision-making process, allowing the control device to safely execute locking only when appropriate without adding complex control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents traffic accidents by ensuring the vehicle is stationary before locking, enhancing user safety and preventing loss of the vehicle, while also providing a convenient and secure locking mechanism for shared vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

The wheel status detection unit may include or be operably coupled to a speed sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpeed sensor detection:

Data Source

PatentUS12172725B2Systems and methods for lock control
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 BEIJING QISHENG SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US12172725B2 patent drawing
  • US12172725B2 patent drawing
  • US12172725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a system and method for controlling a lock of a subject. The system may obtain an instruction for locking the subject. The system may obtain a status of the subject. The system may control the lock of the subject based on the instruction and the status of the subject. In response to a determination that the subject is in a motion status, the system may repeatedly update the status of the subject until an updated status of the subject is a static status. The system may lock the subject by controlling the lock of the subject based on the instruction and the static status of the subject.