Manufacturing Vehicle Mode Switching for Real-Time Safety Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicles in manufacturing environments lack the ability to adaptively switch between different modes of operation, such as manual, guided, and autonomous modes, based on real-time operational conditions, leading to inefficiencies and potential safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with sensors and a controller that determines a match value between sensor data and operational criteria to dynamically switch between manual, guided, and autonomous modes, allowing it to adapt to conditions like inclement weather, power outages, or obstacles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a vehicle operates in a fixed mode (manual, guided, or autonomous), then the control system is simple and easy to operate, but the vehicle cannot adapt to changing operational conditions, reducing flexibility and safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to operational conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle control system implements dynamic mode switching between manual, guided, and autonomous modes based on real-time operational conditions. The controller automatically transitions between different control modes depending on sensor data matching operational criteria, making the system adaptable rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by enabling the vehicle to adjust its degree of automation dynamically, improving adaptability without requiring completely separate control systems for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of automation level based on environmental conditions. By monitoring sensor data and comparing it against operational criteria, the system adjusts the automation parameter (manual/guided/autonomous mode) in response to changing conditions such as weather, obstacles, or power availability. This allows the vehicle to maintain simplicity in each individual mode while achieving overall adaptability through parameter changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a vehicle uses autonomous mode, then productivity and efficiency are improved, but safety risks increase when operational conditions are not favorable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle incorporates sensor feedback systems that continuously monitor operational conditions and provide data to the controller. The controller compares sensor data against predefined operational criteria and automatically adjusts the automation mode in response. This feedback mechanism ensures that autonomous operation only occurs when conditions are favorable, maintaining safety while enabling productivity improvements when appropriate. The system can transition to manual or guided modes when sensor data indicates unfavorable conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by establishing operational criteria and safety thresholds before autonomous operation begins. The controller is pre-programmed with knowledge of favorable and unfavorable conditions, allowing it to prevent unsafe autonomous operation before it occurs. By anticipating potential safety issues and having predefined response protocols, the system can maintain high productivity during safe autonomous operation while preventing safety incidents through preemptive mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If a vehicle operates in manual mode, then safety and control are maintained, but productivity and operational efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational controlVSAvoidmanufacturing output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle implements dynamic mode switching that allows transitions between manual, guided, and autonomous modes based on real-time operational conditions. Rather than being locked into manual mode, the system can automatically transition to more automated modes when conditions are favorable, thereby maintaining safety through operator control when needed while capturing productivity benefits during suitable periods. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by allowing the vehicle to optimize between control and efficiency on a moment-by-moment basis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle's control system is designed to perform multiple functions across different operational modes. The same vehicle can operate in manual mode for high-control tasks, guided mode for routine operations, and autonomous mode for optimized productivity tasks. This multi-functionality allows a single vehicle to achieve both the safety benefits of manual operation and the productivity benefits of automation by selecting the appropriate mode for each specific task or condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle system dynamically switches between modes, then operational flexibility and safety are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: sensor data acquisition, operational criteria comparison, mode determination logic, and actuator control. Each module handles a specific aspect of the mode switching process, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design. The segmentation allows the system to implement flexible mode switching while maintaining clarity in the control architecture and simplifying debugging and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250346469A1Adjustable operation of manufacturing vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 OSHKOSH CORPORATION
  • US20250346469A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346469A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346469A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle may include a frame, a drive system configured to propel the vehicle, an energy storage device configured to provide power to the drive system, a lift implement including a cradle to support a load and a lift assembly configured to adjust a position of the cradle relative to the frame, one or more sensors configured to provide sensing data indicative of at least one of a status of the vehicle, the load supported by the cradle, or an environment surrounding the vehicle, and a controller. The controller is configured to operate the vehicle in a first mode of a plurality of modes including a manual mode, a guided vehicle mode, and an autonomous mode, determine a match value between the sensing data and at least one operational criteria of a plurality of operational criteria; and operate the vehicle in a second mode based on the match value.