Vehicle Motion Bias Estimation Using a Koopman Operator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle motion control systems face biases between input commands and actual vehicle operations, leading to discrepancies such as under- or oversteering, due to mechanical variances and calibration issues, which existing solutions like Luenberger Observers and Kalman Filters often address with oscillatory behavior and sensitivity to tuning.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) that employs a bias estimator circuit using the Koopman operator to estimate and correct biases by recursively solving nonlinear least squares equations, introducing a bias term and applying a forgetting factor to adjust for previous data points, thereby reducing sensitivity to tuning and oscillations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If Luenberger Observers or Kalman Filters are used to estimate and correct steering biases, then bias correction is achieved, but the system exhibits oscillatory behavior and high sensitivity to tuning parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebias estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control systems (Luenberger Observers and Kalman Filters) with a data-driven machine learning model (neural network) to estimate and correct steering biases. This substitution eliminates the oscillatory behavior and tuning sensitivity inherent in traditional approaches while maintaining accurate bias correction through learned patterns from training data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional bias correction methods are applied, then steering accuracy is improved, but the system requires extensive tuning and calibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering control accuracyVSAvoidtuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs bias correction in advance by training a machine learning model on comprehensive datasets that capture various operating conditions and bias scenarios. This preliminary training phase embeds the correction logic into the model structure, eliminating the need for extensive real-time tuning and calibration during actual vehicle operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model achieves self-calibration by learning from training data that includes various bias conditions. The model automatically adapts to different vehicle configurations and operating conditions without requiring manual tuning, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating complex calibration procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240051550A1Estimating and correcting bias in vehicle motion control
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 ATIEVA INC(US)
  • US20240051550A1 patent drawing
  • US20240051550A1 patent drawing
  • US20240051550A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle comprises: an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) generating a command for an aspect of vehicle motion; an actuator for controlling the aspect of the vehicle motion, the actuator connected to the ADAS; and a bias estimator circuit that estimates a bias between the command for the aspect of vehicle motion and an effective vehicle motion aspect, the bias estimator circuit estimating the bias using an operator that predicts a next timestep of nonlinear functions of vehicle state, wherein the command for the aspect of vehicle motion is corrected using the bias estimated by the bias estimator circuit to provide a corrected command for the aspect of vehicle motion for use by the actuator.