Vehicle Motion Control Using Chassis-Aware Torque and Steering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The coordination of multiple electric motors and steering in electric vehicles to achieve concurrent drivability and passenger comfort, while maintaining desired vehicle acceleration and direction changes, is challenging due to the interconnection and conflict between rapid acceleration and direction changes causing increased chassis motion.

Innovation Solution

A controller is employed to predict the effects of command signals using a prediction model, which comprises two models: one for vehicle motion and one for chassis motion, to optimize steering angles and motor forces, minimizing chassis motion while achieving desired drivability and comfort by penalizing lift, pitch, and roll.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If multiple electric motors are used to achieve rapid acceleration and direction changes, then vehicle drivability is improved, but chassis motion (roll, pitch, lift) increases reducing passenger comfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle acceleration and direction change rateVSAvoidchassis motion affecting passenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors vehicle state (acceleration, yaw rate, chassis motion) and adjusts motor forces in real-time based on feedback from sensors. The cost function incorporates chassis motion penalties that are dynamically optimized based on current vehicle state, creating a closed-loop feedback system that reduces chassis motion while maintaining drivability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes motor forces and steering angles as control parameters to optimize the trade-off between drivability and comfort. The cost function weights for chassis motion penalties are adjusted based on driving conditions, allowing the system to prioritize comfort when appropriate while maintaining rapid response when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If active suspensions are used to reduce chassis motion and improve comfort, then passenger comfort is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechassis motionVSAvoidsuspension system complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical active suspension system with an electrical control system that uses multiple electric motors to influence chassis motion. Instead of mechanically actuating suspension components, the system uses motor forces and steering control to achieve the same comfort objective, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The electric motors serve dual functions: providing propulsion for vehicle movement and simultaneously controlling chassis motion for passenger comfort. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate active suspension actuators, reducing overall system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If semi-active suspensions are used to reduce cost compared to active suspensions, then device complexity is reduced, but control capability over chassis motion is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension system complexityVSAvoidchassis motion control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the semi-active suspension mechanism with an electrical control approach using multiple motors. This substitution provides full active control capability without the mechanical complexity of semi-active suspension components, achieving both simplicity and high control capability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4416026B1System and method for controlling motion of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.07.09 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP4416026B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4416026B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4416026B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

A controller and a method for controlling motion of a vehicle is provided. The method comprises acquiring motion information including a current state of the vehicle and a desired state of the vehicle, determining a combination of a steering angle of the wheels and motor forces for moving the vehicle from the current state into the desired state by using a first model of the motion of the vehicle and a second model of the motion of the chassis of the vehicle, determining a cost function of the motion of the vehicle, optimizing the cost function of the motion of the vehicle to compute a command signal for controlling the steering wheel and the plurality of electric motors, and controlling the steering angle of the wheels and the motor forces based on the command signal.