Vehicle Motion Control Device for Lateral Overturn Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle motion control systems are inadequate in preventing lateral overturn, particularly for vehicles with high loading weights, as they fail to sufficiently suppress rolling and vibration during emergency maneuvers.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle motion control device that actively increases brake force at the front inside wheel to cause skidding, synchronized with the outside wheel, based on loading weight, steering angle, roll angle, and friction coefficient, to prevent lateral overturn by generating a suitable brake force for skidding and tilting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If brake force is increased at the outside wheel to prevent lateral overturn, then the vehicle stability improves, but the vehicle rolling and vibration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidvehicle rolling and vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating brake force control between inside and outside wheels. Specifically, the brake force to the front inside wheel is increased to cause skidding, while the brake force to the outside wheel is controlled to prevent excessive rolling. This localized differentiation allows the system to achieve lateral overturn prevention without generating harmful rolling and vibration effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by actively causing the front inside wheel to skid rather than preventing skidding. This inversion is achieved by increasing brake force to the inside wheel until skidding occurs, which generates a lateral force that counteracts the overturning moment. This counterintuitive approach effectively prevents lateral overturn while the control system manages the resulting vehicle dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Stability of the object's composition

If brake force is increased to cause skidding at the front inside wheel, then the lateral overturn prevention improves, but the brake force control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral overturn preventionVSAvoidbrake force control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms to manage brake force control complexity. The brake ECU continuously monitors vehicle state (including lateral acceleration, steering angle, and wheel speeds) and adjusts brake forces to the inside and outside wheels accordingly. This feedback loop enables automatic adaptation to changing conditions, preventing lateral overturn without requiring complex manual intervention or overly sophisticated control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by adjusting brake force levels based on detected vehicle conditions. The system modifies brake pressure parameters dynamically - increasing force to the inside wheel to induce skidding when overturn risk is detected, and adjusting outside wheel force to maintain stability. These parameter adjustments are made through standard brake control mechanisms, keeping system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If duty cycles for W/C pressure boosting and depressurizing are suppressed, then the W/C pressure change is reduced, but the lateral overturn cannot be sufficiently prevented for vehicles with high loading weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stability during brakingVSAvoidlateral overturn prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing differentiated brake force control for inside and outside wheels rather than uniform pressure suppression. The system increases brake force to the front inside wheel to cause controlled skidding, while managing outside wheel brake force separately. This localized approach ensures effective lateral overturn prevention even for vehicles with high loading weight, overcoming the limitations of uniform duty cycle suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively suppresses vehicle rolling and vibration, and further prevents lateral overturn by causing the front inside wheel to skid with higher possibility, thereby enhancing stability and steerability.

Implementation Method 1

a brake force control means which performs anti-lateral overturn control for increasing a brake force to be generated at a front inside wheel of a vehicle in order to cause skidding at the front inside wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8712662B2Vehicle motion control device
Publication Date: 2014.04.29 ADVICS CO LTD
  • US8712662B2 patent drawing
  • US8712662B2 patent drawing
  • US8712662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The vehicle motion control device performs anti-lateral overturn control for increasing a brake force to be generated at a front inside wheel of a vehicle in order to cause skidding at the front inside wheel when a condition for increasing a brake force to be generated at an outside wheel is satisfied, wherein the condition is that the vehicle motion control device is in the anti-lateral overturn mode and the vehicle is turning.