Vehicle Motion Detection for Mobile Device Restriction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for restricting mobile device usage while driving are optional and can be easily disabled by users, making them unreliable in preventing distracted driving accidents.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes an Hours of Service (HOS) system interacting with a vehicle's onboard computer and a mobile app to determine if the vehicle is in motion, restricting unsafe mobile device functionalities and applications, with safety protocols that cannot be overridden until the vehicle is safely parked.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If optional applications are used to restrict mobile device usage while driving, then some level of control is achieved, but the system can be easily disabled by users making it unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestriction enforcementVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of giving users the ability to control restriction settings, the system inverts the approach by automatically detecting driving conditions through sensor data and enforcing restrictions without user input or override capability. The system determines when the vehicle is in motion and automatically applies appropriate restrictions, removing the user control that previously enabled disabling of restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's own sensor data (accelerometers, GPS, engine data) to automatically determine driving conditions and enforce restrictions without requiring external intervention or user configuration. The vehicle system serves itself by monitoring its own state and autonomously controlling mobile device functionality based on detected motion status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the system automatically detects vehicle motion and enforces restrictions, then reliability of preventing distracted driving is improved, but device complexity increases due to integration with vehicle systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistracted driving preventionVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages the vehicle's existing multi-functional sensor suite (accelerometers for crash detection, GPS for location tracking, engine control units for motion detection) to also perform driving status detection for mobile device restriction. By making these existing sensors serve multiple functions, the system avoids adding dedicated hardware while achieving reliable automated restriction enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile application acts as an intermediary layer between the vehicle's existing sensor systems and the mobile device control functions. Rather than directly integrating complex control systems into the vehicle, the intermediary app receives sensor data, processes it according to driving conditions, and enforces appropriate restrictions, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10893136B2System and method for controlling in-vehicle electronic devices
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 STRICEVIC BORIS
  • US10893136B2 patent drawing
  • US10893136B2 patent drawing
  • US10893136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for monitoring the status of a vehicle to obtain vehicle status data, and controlling an electronic device based on the vehicle status data is disclosed. The device that may monitor the status of the vehicle may be an hours of service system (HOS), and the electronic device may be a mobile device. The controlling of the mobile device may include restricting use of the devices functionalities.