Traveling Vehicle Motor Control Switching for Wheel Lock Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicles using PI or PID control for independent left and right motor control can result in discomfort or 'wrongness' during small-turn maneuvers, particularly at low speeds, due to potential wheel locking or low-speed operation.

Innovation Solution

A traveling vehicle with independently controlled left and right driving wheels employs a control method that switches between PI and P control based on operational parameters, adjusting control periods within a control cycle to smooth transitions and prevent wheel locking, using a setting section to manage control gains and switchover algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PI control is used for controlling motor currents, then vehicle stability is improved, but wheel locking may occur at low speeds causing user discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the control method switchable between PI control and P control based on operational conditions. The control system dynamically adapts by selecting different control strategies: PI control for general stability and P control for low-speed scenarios where wheel locking occurs, thereby resolving the contradiction between stability and user comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes control parameters by switching between different control methods (PI vs P control) and adjusting the integral term correction gain based on vehicle speed and operational conditions. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain stability while preventing wheel locking at low speeds, thus improving both reliability and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If integral term correction gain is reduced to prevent wheel locking, then user comfort is improved, but vehicle stability control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidvehicle stability control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the integral term correction gain based on real-time operational conditions such as vehicle speed and acceleration. By making the gain adjustable rather than fixed, the system can provide gentle control at low speeds (improving comfort) while maintaining strong stability control at higher speeds (preserving reliability)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the integral term correction gain according to vehicle speed and operational state. The gain is reduced at low speeds to prevent wheel locking and increased at higher speeds to maintain stability control effectiveness, thus resolving the contradiction between comfort and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If control method switchover is implemented, then user comfort is improved, but control parameter discontinuity may cause instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidcontrol parameter continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the integral term correction gain as an intermediary parameter to smoothly transition between PI control and P control methods. By gradually adjusting the gain rather than making abrupt switches, the system maintains control parameter continuity while still providing the benefits of method switchover for user comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If small-turn maneuver is performed at low speed, then vehicle maneuverability is improved, but wheel locking occurs causing road surface damage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidroad surface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes control parameters by reducing the integral term correction gain and switching to P control at low speeds during small-turn maneuvers. This parameter adjustment prevents excessive motor current and wheel locking, thereby maintaining maneuverability while preventing road surface damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3704931B1Traveling vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.10.13 KUBOTA CORP
  • EP3704931B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3704931B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3704931B1 patent drawingFigure 3(A)~3(E)

AI summary

A traveling vehicle (1) includes a pair of left and right driving wheels (3), a pair of left and right motors (20) capable of driving the pair of left and right driving wheels (3) independently of each other, an operational amount reception section (51) capable of receiving operational amounts respectively for the pair of left and right motors (20), a setting section (52) capable of setting a period of a first control method having a predetermined first control parameter and a period of a second control method having a predetermined second control parameter, within a predetermined control cycle for controlling driving of the motors (20), in accordance with the operational amounts and a motor driving section (53) capable of driving the respective motors (20) based on result of setting made by the setting section (52).