Vehicle Movement Control via Static Node Topology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlling autonomous vehicles in confined geographical areas with narrow passages and dynamic conditions poses challenges, including increased risk of collision and inefficient traffic planning.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that uses processing circuitry to define vehicle paths with static nodes, obtain real-time vehicle profiles, and apply a cost function to identify alternative movement controls that reduce fuel consumption, fulfill transport missions, and minimize vehicle wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicles are controlled in confined geographical areas with narrow passages, then the risk of collision increases, but the traffic planning efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision riskVSAvoidtraffic planning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining vehicle paths through static nodes and pre-calculating optimal routes before vehicles enter confined areas. The computer system proactively plans movements and identifies alternative paths in advance, allowing vehicles to navigate narrow passages efficiently without collisions while maintaining traffic planning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring vehicle locations in real-time and adjusting traffic planning data structures based on actual vehicle positions and threshold condition violations. This closed-loop approach enables dynamic optimization of vehicle movements through confined areas, reducing collision risks while maintaining planning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If vehicles are slowed down well-ahead of narrow passages to reduce collision risk, then fuel consumption increases, but safety improves

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamic speed adjustments by calculating optimal velocity profiles that adapt to vehicle positions, passage locations, and traffic conditions. Instead of uniform deceleration, the system dynamically modulates speeds to maintain safety margins while minimizing energy consumption, allowing vehicles to accelerate safely through narrow passages when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by optimizing speed, acceleration, and position parameters to balance safety and fuel efficiency. The cost function evaluates different parameter combinations and selects movement controls that achieve safety objectives with minimal energy consumption, enabling intelligent trade-off between these competing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If alternative movement controls are applied to reduce fuel consumption and vehicle wear, then traffic planning complexity increases, but sustainability improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidtraffic planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses simplified representations by creating a topological model of the geographical area using static nodes and vehicle paths. This abstracted copy of the environment allows complex traffic planning to be performed on a simplified data structure rather than raw geographical data, reducing computational complexity while enabling sophisticated optimization for fuel efficiency and vehicle wear reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex real-time mechanical traffic planning with a computational approach using cost functions and optimized data structures. By substituting traditional reactive traffic control with proactive computational optimization, the system achieves sophisticated movement control for sustainability goals while managing complexity through algorithmic approaches rather than mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250182621A1System and method of controlling movements of vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 VOLVO AUTONOMOUS SOLUTIONS AB
  • US20250182621A1 patent drawing
  • US20250182621A1 patent drawing
  • US20250182621A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system controls movements of a plurality of vehicles in a confined geographical area. A subset of static nodes defines a topological representation of the at least one vehicle path, each static node further having a set of vehicle-related threshold conditions. The system obtains real-time vehicle travelling profiles of the plurality of vehicles; determines, for each vehicle of the plurality of vehicles, a vehicle location at a given point of time based on data from the static nodes and the obtained real-time vehicle travelling profiles; generates a traffic planning data structure containing data indicative of the determined vehicle location at the given point in time and the positional order of the static node occupied by the vehicle; determines that at least one vehicle of the plurality of vehicles exceeds at least one vehicle-related threshold condition of the set of vehicle-related threshold conditions; applies a cost function on the data contained in the generated traffic planning data structure to identify an alternative movement control of the at least one vehicle through the at least one vehicle path; updates the traffic planning data structure to an updated traffic planning data structure; and feeds motion commands to the plurality of vehicles.