In-Vehicle Network Message Validation by Reception Interval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle network monitoring devices fail to efficiently detect unauthorized messages from cyclically transmitted data based on their transmission cycle.

Innovation Solution

An in-vehicle apparatus that determines the validity of data by deriving the reception interval of consecutively received data of the same type and comparing it to a specified normal cycle range, set based on the reception time of earlier data, to efficiently identify unauthorized messages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional monitoring methods are used without considering transmission cycles, then the monitoring device can operate with simple logic, but it fails to efficiently detect unauthorized messages from cyclically transmitted data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-stores normal transmission cycle information for each data type in a storage unit before monitoring begins. This preliminary preparation allows the monitoring unit to efficiently compare received data cycles against known normal patterns without complex real-time analysis, thereby improving detection accuracy while maintaining relatively simple monitoring logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring unit continuously compares the actual reception intervals of cyclically transmitted data against the stored normal cycle ranges. When deviations are detected, the system generates alert information and can notify relevant ECUs. This feedback mechanism enables precise detection of unauthorized messages by leveraging the regular cyclic patterns of legitimate communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the monitoring device checks every message without considering transmission cycles, then it can detect all potential unauthorized messages, but it increases processing load and reduces detection efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidunauthorized message detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing exhaustive checks on every single message, the system applies partial monitoring focused specifically on cyclically transmitted data types. By identifying and monitoring only those message types that follow regular transmission cycles, the system achieves high detection efficiency for unauthorized messages while avoiding the excessive processing load of analyzing all messages equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring approach segments data traffic by type, identifying which data types are transmitted cyclically and which are not. The monitoring unit then applies cycle-based validation only to the segmented cyclic data types, allowing efficient detection without the overhead of uniform monitoring across all message types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses fixed cycle thresholds for validation, then the detection logic is simple, but it cannot adapt to network variations and timing jitter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to network variationsVSAvoidcycle range specification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces fixed cycle thresholds with dynamic cycle ranges. Instead of a single fixed value, each data type has an associated normal cycle range that can accommodate timing variations and network jitter. The monitoring unit checks whether received data intervals fall within these adaptive ranges, enabling the system to tolerate normal network variations while still detecting genuine anomalies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter from a fixed cycle value to a range of acceptable cycle values. By specifying normal cycle ranges rather than fixed thresholds, the system adapts to network variations and timing jitter inherent in automotive communication networks, while the complexity increase is managed through pre-stored range definitions for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260075393A1In-vehicle apparatus, computer program and information processing method
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 AUTONETWORKS TECH LTD
  • US20260075393A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075393A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075393A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An in-vehicle apparatus configured to be connected to an in-vehicle network installed in a vehicle includes a processing unit that performs processing relating to determining the validity of data flowing through the in-vehicle network. The processing unit receives a plurality of data flowing through the in-vehicle network, derives a reception interval of when data of the same type is received consecutively out of the received plurality of data, and determines, based on the reception interval and a normal cycle range specified on a basis of the reception time point of data received earlier out of the data of the same type received consecutively, the validity of data received later out of the data of the same type received consecutively.