Vehicle Object Detection Spatial Deviation Noise Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting objects around a motor vehicle using distance sensors suffer from high latency and inability to distinguish between real objects and interference signals, leading to inconsistent measurement points and potential errors in object detection.

Innovation Solution

A method employing a control device that evaluates measurement points from multiple distance sensors by determining spatial deviations and scatter, assigning points to specific sensors, and using a noise indicator to differentiate between object-related and noise signals, thereby improving the reliability of object detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If measurement points are confirmed in several consecutive measuring sequences, then reliability of object detection is improved, but latency time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection reliabilityVSAvoidlatency time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the evaluation parameter from simple presence/absence of measurement points to spatial deviation analysis. By calculating whether measurement points deviate from a reference position by more than a threshold value, the system can quickly identify and filter noise signals without requiring multiple confirmation sequences, thus reducing latency while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the temporal confirmation mechanism (waiting for multiple measuring sequences) with a spatial analysis mechanism (comparing measurement point positions). This substitution allows immediate differentiation between real objects and noise based on spatial consistency, eliminating the time delay inherent in sequential confirmation approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If measurement points are confirmed in several consecutive measuring sequences, then reliability of object detection is improved, but the system cannot distinguish between real objects and interference signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection reliabilityVSAvoidsignal differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality analysis by examining the spatial characteristics of individual measurement points rather than treating all measurements uniformly. By checking whether each measurement point's position deviates from the reference by more than a threshold value, the system can locally identify and exclude noise signals while confirming real objects, preserving signal differentiation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a reference position as an intermediary for comparison. This reference serves as a mediator between raw measurement data and object identification, allowing the system to objectively distinguish real objects from noise based on spatial deviation from the reference, thereby maintaining differentiation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If spatial deviation verification is performed on measurement points, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelative position determination precisionVSAvoidcontrol device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the object detection process into distinct evaluation steps: determining measurement points, comparing positions with reference, checking threshold deviations, and selectively confirming points. This segmentation allows the control device to implement precision verification through a structured, modular approach that manages complexity by breaking down the verification process into manageable operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces latency and enhances the accuracy of object detection by reliably confirming measurement points and filtering out noise, ensuring precise determination of the relative position between the vehicle and objects, even in the presence of external influences like dirt or weather conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a transmission signal is sent out with the distance sensors, which is reflected by the object. The reflected transmission signal or echo signal can then be detected again by the distance sensor. The distance can be determined on the basis of the transit time between the transmission of the transmission signal and the reception of the echo signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEcho: Echo

Data Source

PatentEP3250943B1Method for object acquisition in the environment of a vehicle by verifying a spatial deviation of measurement points, control device, driver assistance system and vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.06.30 VALEO SCHALTER & SENSOREN GMBH
  • EP3250943B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3250943B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3250943B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for detecting an object in a surrounding region (7) of a motor vehicle (1), wherein a plurality of measuring sequences are carried out, wherein in each measuring sequence at least one measurement point (8, 9) is determined by a control device (3) based on the sensor signals from at least two distance sensors (4), said measurement point describing a relative position between the motor vehicle (1) and the object, wherein it is checked by the control device (3) whether the measurement points (8, 9) determined during at least two of the measuring sequences have a predetermined spatial deviation to one another, wherein a distribution (s) of the measurement points (8, 9) is determined in the event that the measurement points (8, 9) have said predetermined spatial deviation to one another.