Vehicle Obstacle Avoidance Alerts for Distracted Driver Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to provide appropriate notifications to occupants based on the vehicle's situation, particularly when a driver is in a distracted state and an obstacle is present, which can lead to inadequate safety measures.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that includes a recognizer to identify the vehicle's surroundings and driver state, a controller for executing driving controls like steering and deceleration, and a notifier that provides tiered notifications (first and second notifications) based on the vehicle's proximity to an obstacle and the driver's responsiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If notification control is not implemented before avoidance control, then the system complexity is reduced, but the appropriateness of notifications to occupants deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidnotification appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The notification system is segmented into multiple notification stages (first notification, second notification, third notification) with different notification methods and intensities. This segmentation allows the system to provide appropriate notifications for different urgency levels without requiring a completely complex decision-making structure, as each stage has predefined notification characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary notification actions before executing avoidance control. By issuing notifications in advance (first notification before avoidance control, second notification before or during avoidance control), the system prepares the occupant for upcoming maneuvers, improving notification appropriateness without adding complex real-time decision-making requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple notification stages are implemented, then the notification appropriateness is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification appropriatenessVSAvoidnotification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different notification methods are applied locally to different stages and situations. The first notification uses gentle methods (display only), the second notification uses stronger methods (display and sound), and the third notification uses the strongest methods (display, sound, and vibration). This local differentiation of notification quality allows appropriate notifications without requiring a single complex notification mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The notification system dynamically adapts its characteristics based on the situation. The notification method, intensity, and timing are dynamically adjusted according to whether avoidance control is needed, the urgency of the situation, and the occupant's response. This dynamic behavior allows the system to provide appropriate notifications without requiring a static complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the system waits for avoidance control execution before notifying occupants, then the notification timing is simplified, but the safety effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification timing complexityVSAvoidsafety effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system issues notifications in advance before executing avoidance control. The first notification is issued before avoidance control to alert the occupant of potential danger, and the second notification is issued before or during avoidance control to confirm the maneuver. This preliminary notification approach improves safety effectiveness by giving the occupant advance warning without complicating the timing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by notifying the occupant before the avoidance maneuver occurs, allowing the occupant to mentally prepare and potentially take additional actions. This preliminary warning prevents the occupant from being surprised by sudden maneuvers, improving overall safety effectiveness without requiring complex timing coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20250108860A1Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250108860A1 patent drawing
  • US20250108860A1 patent drawing
  • US20250108860A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device of an embodiment includes a recognizer that recognizes a surrounding situation of a vehicle; a driving state detector that detects a driving state of a driver; a controller that executes, when an obstacle is present in front of the vehicle and the driver is in a distracted driving state, driving control suitable for the obstacle; and a notifier that issues a notification when the driving control is executed. The notifier includes a first notification which is notified at the time of execution of first driving control including steering control, and a second notification which is notified at the time of execution of second driving control executed in a state in which the vehicle has approached further toward the obstacle from in the first driving control. The second notification is issued when a particular driving support function is operated within a predetermined time from the first notification.