Vehicle Obstacle Detection Using Multi-Sensor Triangulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object detection systems for vehicles often perform control actions against the driver's intention when determining the presence and movement of obstacles, leading to unreliable detection and premature start rejection control.

Innovation Solution

An object detection apparatus with multiple range sensors installed around a vehicle, using triangulation to determine the presence and position of obstacles, and a crossing determination mechanism to release start rejection control when obstacles are confirmed to have crossed the vehicle's path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If start rejection control is performed based on single sensor detection, then obstacle detection reliability is improved, but false detection increases when obstacles temporarily leave the detection area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoidfalse detection of obstacle absence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The detection area is divided into multiple regions with multiple range sensors (first detection section and second detection section) positioned at different locations. Each sensor independently monitors its own detection area, and the control unit integrates information from all sensors to determine obstacle presence, preventing false release of start rejection control when an obstacle temporarily leaves one sensor's view but remains detected by others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit combines detection results from multiple range sensors to make a unified determination about obstacle presence. By merging the detection information from the first and second detection sections, the system achieves more reliable obstacle detection than any single sensor could provide alone, reducing false detections while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple range sensors are used to improve detection accuracy, then obstacle detection reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple range sensors perform the same detection function but from different positions and detection areas. Each sensor is a standard range sensor component, and their results are universally processed by the control unit using the same determination logic, achieving enhanced reliability without requiring complex specialized components for each sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously receives detection results from multiple sensors and dynamically adjusts the start rejection control based on the integrated feedback. When all sensors detect an obstacle, start rejection is maintained; when sensors indicate obstacle absence, control is released. This feedback mechanism efficiently processes multiple sensor inputs without requiring complex decision logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves the accuracy and reliability of detecting obstacles and releasing start rejection control in a manner aligned with the driver's intentions by using continuous detection from multiple sensors and determining obstacle crossing states.

Implementation Method 1

a first detection section which transmits search waves in a moving direction of the moving object, and receives reflected waves of the search waves as detection information of the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

a second detection section which transmits search waves in the moving direction of the movable body from a position different from that of the first detection section, and receives reflected waves of the search waves as detection information of the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9575179B2Object detection apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.02.21 DENSO CORP
  • US9575179B2 patent drawing
  • US9575179B2 patent drawing
  • US9575179B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object detection apparatus is installed in a movable body and detects an object. The apparatus includes a first detection section which transmits search waves in a moving direction of the moving object, and receives reflected waves as detection information to detect the object, a second detection section which transmits search waves in the moving direction, and receives reflected waves as detection information, an obstacle determination section which determines that an obstacle is present in the moving direction, based on detection results of the first and second detection sections, and a crossing determination section which determines that the obstacle has crossed, in a state where the obstacle determination section determines that the obstacle is present, if the determination that the obstacle is present is made by continuous detection, and if a state where the object is continuously detected changes to a state where the object is not detected.