Vehicle Occupant Authentication via Remote Server Mediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Car rental companies face challenges in ensuring compliance with driver authorization for rental vehicles, as they lack effective methods to verify who operates the vehicles, which is crucial for insurance and surcharge purposes.

Innovation Solution

A computing device in the vehicle obtains identifying information from the occupant and communicates with a remote authentication server to determine authorization, enabling or disabling vehicle operation based on the response, using various types of identifying information such as authentication codes, biometrics, or document photographs, and temporarily allowing operation if connectivity is initially lacking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a remote authentication server is used to verify driver authorization, then insurance compliance and theft prevention are improved, but system complexity and dependency on external connectivity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver authorization verificationVSAvoidauthentication system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A remote authentication server acts as an intermediary between the vehicle computing device and the driver authorization database. The server receives identifying information from the vehicle, performs background verification against rental company records, and returns authentication results. This mediator approach centralizes complex verification logic externally, improving local system reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the vehicle disables operation when authentication fails, then theft prevention is improved, but user convenience and operational flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidvehicle access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring positive proof of authorization before enabling vehicle operation, the system inverts the approach by temporarily enabling operation and then verifying authentication. The vehicle computing device allows the occupant to start and operate the vehicle initially, then performs background authentication. If authentication fails, the system revokes access by disabling vehicle operation. This inversion improves ease of operation by eliminating upfront authentication barriers while maintaining theft prevention through subsequent verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If multiple types of identifying information are accepted (biometrics, codes, documents), then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and authentication security may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication processVSAvoidauthentication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the authentication parameter being verified based on the type of identifying information provided. For biometric data like facial recognition or fingerprint scans, the system adjusts verification thresholds and comparison algorithms accordingly. For authentication codes, it validates format and cross-references with rental records. For document photographs, it employs OCR and security feature verification. The remote authentication server adapts its verification precision to match the specific parameter type, maintaining both ease of operation and authentication accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10875499B2Vehicle occupant authentication system
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 HERTZ CORP
  • US10875499B2 patent drawing
  • US10875499B2 patent drawing
  • US10875499B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed that is implemented by a computing device in a vehicle. Identifying information is obtained from an occupant of the vehicle via an input device operatively connected to the computing device. If the computing device has connectivity to a remote authentication server, the computing device transmits a request to the authentication server, and controls whether full operation of the vehicle is enabled or disabled based on a response from the remote authentication server. The request includes the identifying information and a vehicle identifier of the vehicle, and requests that the authentication server determine, based on the identifying information and the vehicle identifier, whether the occupant is authorized to operate the vehicle. If the computing device lacks connectivity to the remote authentication server, full operation of the vehicle is temporarily enabled until the computing device has connectivity to the remote authentication server.