Vehicle Occupant Authentication Using Facial, Body, and Spoof Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems are vulnerable to spoofing attacks, where an occupant attempts to deceive the vehicle's identification systems by using images, videos, or 3D masks of authorized individuals, posing risks during semi-autonomous or autonomous driving.

Innovation Solution

A device equipped with multiple sensors, including cameras for facial and body attribute detection, processes sensor data to identify occupants and detect spoofing attempts by comparing facial and body attributes with stored data, using machine learning algorithms to generate spoofing attempt scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the vehicle uses identification systems to recognize occupants, then the convenience of accessing vehicle functions is improved, but the system becomes vulnerable to spoofing attacks using images, videos, or 3D masks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant authentication convenienceVSAvoidauthentication security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from two-dimensional image-based recognition to three-dimensional depth-aware recognition by integrating depth camera data with RGB camera data. This dimensional enhancement allows the system to distinguish real occupants from spoofing attempts using images, videos, or masks by analyzing depth information and spatial relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple sensing modalities including RGB cameras, depth cameras, and sensor fusion techniques to create a comprehensive authentication framework. By merging visual data with depth information and behavioral analysis, the system maintains convenience while significantly improving security against spoofing attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If the vehicle implements continuous spoofing detection during driving, then the safety against spoofing attacks is improved, but the system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoofing detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication checks using depth information and spatial analysis before granting full access to vehicle functions. By conducting initial verification of the occupant's physical presence and position, the system reduces the computational burden during continuous monitoring while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediate verification layers including depth map analysis, spatial relationship validation, and behavioral pattern recognition that act as mediators between the raw sensor data and final authentication decisions. These intermediary steps simplify the overall processing complexity by filtering and pre-processing data before final analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the vehicle uses multiple sensors for facial and body attribute detection, then the precision of occupant identification is improved, but the energy consumption and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacial attribute detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor processing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing intensities to different regions of the sensor data, focusing computational resources on critical facial features and key body attributes while using simpler analysis for less critical areas. This localized quality approach maintains high precision for authentication-critical measurements while reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses full-resolution sensor data only when authentication is required, while employing downsampled or reduced-resolution processing during continuous monitoring. This partial action approach maintains measurement precision when needed while significantly reducing energy consumption during routine operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12315302B2Methods and devices for an occupant of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 INTEL CORP
  • US12315302B2 patent drawing
  • US12315302B2 patent drawing
  • US12315302B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and methods for an occupant of a vehicle are provided in this disclosure. A device for identifying an occupant of a vehicle may include a processor. The processor may be configured to determine an identity for the occupant based on a first sensor data including information indicating a detection of a facial attribute of the occupant. The processor may further be configured to estimate a behavior for the occupant based on a second sensor data including information indicating a detection of a body attribute of the occupant. The processor may further be configured to determine a spoofing attempt result indicating whether the occupant attempts a spoofing based on the determined identity and the estimated behavior.