Vehicle Operation Control Apparatus Adaptive Warning Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to effectively ensure driver safety by providing unnecessary warnings and do not adequately prevent dangerous operations of in-car electrical components, as they lack a mechanism to determine the danger level based on vehicle travel conditions.

Innovation Solution

An operation control apparatus that includes a dangerous region determination section, which sets a dangerous region based on vehicle speed and obstacle detection, determining whether it is safe to operate in-car electrical components and issuing warnings only when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a warning is given to encourage the driver to drive safely, then the driver safety is improved, but the driver becomes annoyed due to unnecessary warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoiddriver annoyance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of warning issuance by introducing a danger level determination mechanism. Warnings are selectively issued based on the evaluated danger level of operating the electrical component, rather than being issued uniformly. This resolves the contradiction by making the warning system adaptive to actual safety conditions, improving reliability while reducing unnecessary warnings that cause annoyance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a warning is given when there is a vehicle ahead and high speed, then the driver safety is improved, but the warning becomes unnecessary when there is no vehicle ahead and low speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidunnecessary warning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of warning issuance by introducing a danger level determination mechanism. Warnings are selectively issued based on the evaluated danger level of operating the electrical component, rather than being issued uniformly. This resolves the contradiction by making the warning system adaptive to actual safety conditions, improving reliability while reducing unnecessary warnings that cause annoyance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by issuing warnings only when the danger level exceeds a certain threshold, rather than issuing warnings in all possible situations. The danger level determination section evaluates multiple factors (vehicle speed, distance to other vehicles, operational context) and issues warnings only when necessary, avoiding the waste of energy from unnecessary warnings while maintaining safety where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the vehicle control system assists in making up for driving deficiency, then the collision avoidance is improved, but the system cannot operate under any circumstances and the driver must ultimately drive safely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidsystem operability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the warning issuance adaptive rather than static. The danger level determination section dynamically evaluates the current driving situation, including vehicle speed, distance to other vehicles, and operational context, to determine whether a warning should be issued. This allows the system to operate effectively under varying circumstances, improving both collision avoidance and adaptability to different driving conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10311734B2Operation control apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US10311734B2 patent drawing
  • US10311734B2 patent drawing
  • US10311734B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation control apparatus mounted in a vehicle includes a dangerous region determination section which sets a dangerous region in a vehicle travel direction from the vehicle in accordance with the travel speed of the vehicle, and when an obstacle is detected in the dangerous region, determines that it is dangerous to operate an in-car electrical component equipped in the vehicle; an operation detection section which detects that an operation of the in-car electrical component is done; and a dangerous operation recognition section which, when it is determined in the dangerous region determination section that an operation of the in-car electrical component is dangerous, and it is detected in the operation detection section that an operation of the in-car electrical component is done, recognizes a dangerous operation and outputs a signal for issuing an alarm.