In-Vehicle Operation Restriction by External Terminal Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information processing devices, such as in-vehicle systems, face the challenge of allowing flexible operation restrictions to prevent unauthorized access to functions, especially during vehicle operation, as existing technologies do not effectively differentiate between user and external terminal operations.

Innovation Solution

The device implements a system with a communication interface and user interface that identifies external terminal sources of operation requests, applying restrictions based on stored information to ensure that only authorized users, typically the driver, can operate critical functions during vehicle travel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If operation requests are accepted from external terminals, then accessibility and convenience are improved, but security and authorization control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidauthorization control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments operation requests into two distinct types: first operation requests from the user interface and second operation requests from external terminals. This segmentation allows different processing paths and restriction applications for each source, enabling selective control while maintaining accessibility from authorized sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different restriction rules locally based on the request source. For second operation requests from external terminals, the system identifies the terminal and applies operation restrictions based on identification results, while first operation requests from the user interface are subject to different restriction logic. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing accessibility where appropriate while maintaining security where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If operation restrictions are applied to all requests, then security is improved, but flexibility and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic operation restrictions that adapt based on the situation. The restriction execution unit determines whether to apply restrictions based on the type of operation request and identification results from external terminals. This dynamic approach allows the system to be restrictive when necessary for security while remaining flexible and adaptable when conditions permit, resolving the contradiction between security and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If external terminal operations are permitted, then versatility is improved, but harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidunauthorized operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary identification process between external terminal requests and operation execution. The external terminal identifying unit acts as a mediator that verifies the source of second operation requests before allowing them to proceed. This intermediary layer filters out unauthorized operations while permitting legitimate ones, thus maintaining versatility while reducing harmful factors from unauthorized access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240288998A1Information processing device and computer program
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 FAURECIA CLARION ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20240288998A1 patent drawing
  • US20240288998A1 patent drawing
  • US20240288998A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The information processing device receives a first operation request from a user via a user interface or a second operation request from an external terminal via a communication interface, and when the first operation request is received, the information processing device executes an operation restriction based on the restriction information, and when a second operation request is received, the information processing device executes an operation restriction based on the requesting external terminal and the restriction information.