Real-Time Vehicle Operator Assessment Feedback System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle training techniques lack the ability to provide real-time feedback to operators, leading to increased training sessions, costs, and time required for pilots to become proficient, as feedback is typically received after the training session and not during.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a display system and an assessment system that receives real-time information from vehicle operators or hardware systems, determining performance and generating feedback to be displayed during operation, including graphical indicia for corrective actions to improve performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional post-session debriefing is used to assess operator performance, then comprehensive assessment data can be collected, but feedback is delayed and training efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of operator performance during the training session itself, rather than waiting for post-session debriefing. Sensors continuously monitor operator actions and the system evaluates performance in real-time, providing immediate feedback while the training event is still occurring. This eliminates the time delay between training and assessment while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous real-time feedback by monitoring operator performance during training sessions and immediately presenting assessment results. The feedback loop occurs during the training event rather than after completion, allowing operators to receive timely guidance and adjust their performance while the training context is still active, thereby reducing overall training time while maintaining assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple training sessions are conducted to improve operator proficiency, then operator skill level increases, but training costs and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator proficiencyVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides immediate real-time feedback during training sessions, allowing operators to correct mistakes and improve performance while the training context is still active. This continuous feedback loop accelerates the learning process, enabling operators to achieve proficiency in fewer training sessions compared to traditional post-session debriefing methods, thereby improving training efficiency while maintaining high operator proficiency standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables operators to self-assess and self-correct their performance by providing immediate feedback during training sessions. Operators can independently identify their mistakes and make adjustments without requiring extensive instructor intervention or multiple repetitive training sessions, thereby reducing overall training time and costs while achieving the same proficiency levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If instructors manually assess operator performance, then detailed evaluation can be provided, but the assessment process becomes time-consuming and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment completenessVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically captures and evaluates operator performance data through sensors and onboard computers, eliminating the need for manual instructor assessment. The system independently processes training data, generates performance evaluations, and provides feedback without requiring instructor time for data collection and analysis, thereby maintaining comprehensive assessment completeness while dramatically reducing assessment time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual instructor assessment with automated electronic evaluation using sensors, data recorders, and computer processing. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with electronic automation enables comprehensive performance tracking without the time-consuming nature of manual assessment, allowing simultaneous monitoring of multiple parameters and immediate generation of evaluation results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10964226B2Instructional assessment system for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 THE BOEING CO
  • US10964226B2 patent drawing
  • US10964226B2 patent drawing
  • US10964226B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for assessing performance of an operation for a vehicle. Real-time information is received by a computer system in the vehicle from at least one of a vehicle operator or a group of hardware systems in the vehicle during the operation for the vehicle. The performance of the vehicle operator in performing the operation is determined by from the real-time information. A graphical image of the feedback is displayed in a display system in the vehicle during the operation in which the graphical image provides guidance in operating the vehicle to perform the operation. The graphical image of the feedback comprises a graphical indicium of a corrective action for the correcting operation of the vehicle while carrying out the operation of the vehicle in which the graphical indicium enables improving performance of the operation of the vehicle by the vehicle operator.