Vehicle Parameter Set Selection for Usage-Specific Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle configuration settings are not optimized for specific operating conditions, leading to reduced efficiency and increased wear on components, which is particularly problematic for enterprises operating large fleets of vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A configuration management system that selectively provides parameter sets to vehicles based on predicted or sensed conditions of usage, allowing for supervised or autonomous selection of optimal settings for different sub-fleets or individual vehicles, using a combination of hardware processing circuits and machine-readable instructions to manage and transmit parameter sets over wireless networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single set of configuration settings is used for all vehicles, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but vehicle efficiency and component durability deteriorate due to suboptimal operation under varying conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle efficiencyVSAvoidconfiguration management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically assigns configuration settings to vehicles based on real-time or predicted usage conditions. Instead of static configuration, the system adapts parameters such as routing preferences, operational modes, and resource allocation dynamically, allowing vehicles to operate optimally under varying conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters of vehicles based on predicted or sensed usage conditions. Different configuration sets with optimized parameter values are assigned according to specific conditions (e.g., delivery routes, load types, time of day), enabling vehicles to adapt their behavior without physical modifications, thus improving efficiency while keeping the base vehicle design simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If configuration settings are optimized for specific usage conditions, then vehicle efficiency and component durability are improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple parameter sets and prediction systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent durabilityVSAvoidparameter set management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of usage conditions and pre-assigns optimal configuration settings before vehicles operate. By predicting future usage patterns or analyzing historical data, the system prepares appropriate parameter sets in advance, ensuring vehicles are configured for durability and efficiency from the start of each operation cycle, rather than reacting to conditions after damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where operational data from vehicles is continuously collected and analyzed. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual usage patterns, refine predictions, and adjust configuration assignments to maximize component durability. The feedback-driven approach automates the complexity of managing multiple parameter sets, making the system self-optimizing rather than manually complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple parameter sets are provided for different conditions, then adaptability and vehicle efficiency are improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in selecting appropriate settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusage condition adaptabilityVSAvoidparameter set selection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables vehicles to effectively select their own optimal configuration settings through automated decision-making based on predicted or sensed conditions. Rather than requiring human operators to manually choose from multiple parameter sets, the system self-determines the appropriate configuration and applies it automatically, maintaining high adaptability while preserving ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer (the configuration management system) that sits between the multiple available parameter sets and the vehicle operations. This intermediary automatically matches vehicles with appropriate configurations based on usage conditions, shielding operators from the complexity of multiple settings while maintaining full adaptability. The intermediary translates complex condition-parameter mappings into simple automated decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3609757B1Parameter sets for vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.05.01 MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD
  • EP3609757B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3609757B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3609757B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

In some examples, a controller determines a target condition of usage of a vehicle, and selects a parameter set from among a plurality of parameter sets based on the determined target condition of usage of the vehicle, the plurality of parameter sets corresponding to different conditions of usage of the vehicle, where each parameter set of the plurality of parameter sets includes one or more parameters that control adjustment of one or more respective adjustable elements of the vehicle. The controller transmits, to the vehicle, the selected parameter set to control a setting of the one or more adjustable elements of the vehicle.