Vehicle Parts Database Matching for Inspection-Free Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems require physical inspection of vehicles to determine customization work items, which can vary based on existing parts, making the process inefficient and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that uses a vehicle database to identify existing vehicle parts based on an identifier, determining customization work items, fees, and locations without physical inspection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If physical inspection of vehicles is performed to determine customization work items, then accuracy of work item determination is improved, but time consumption and processing efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of work item determinationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing vehicle specification data, existing parts information, and work item data in databases before customization requests arrive. When a customization request is received, the system retrieves and processes this pre-prepared data to determine work items without needing physical inspection, thus maintaining accuracy while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and uses digital copies of vehicle data (vehicle identification data, specification data, existing parts information) stored in databases as substitutes for physical vehicle inspection. These digital copies contain all necessary information to accurately determine customization work items without requiring actual physical examination of the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If physical inspection is conducted to identify existing parts, then reliability of customization determination is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of customization determinationVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes feedback loops where vehicle identification data is used to query databases for existing parts information, work items are determined based on this feedback, and the results are stored for future reference. This automated feedback mechanism ensures reliable customization determination while maintaining high processing efficiency through systematic data retrieval and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical physical inspection process with an automated information processing system that uses database queries, data comparison, and algorithmic determination. This substitution eliminates manual inspection while maintaining reliability through systematic processing of vehicle identification data and existing parts information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual checking of vehicles is performed, then accuracy of work item identification is improved, but device complexity increases due to inspection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of work item identificationVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universal databases that store multiple types of information (vehicle specifications, existing parts, work items, fees, locations) that can serve various customization scenarios. This multi-functional database system provides accurate work item identification across different vehicle types and customization needs without requiring complex specialized inspection equipment for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces databases as intermediary components between vehicle identification and work item determination. These databases act as mediators that store and provide relevant information, eliminating the need for direct physical inspection while maintaining accuracy. The intermediary databases simplify the overall system by centralizing information management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12450573B2Information processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12450573B2 patent drawing
  • US12450573B2 patent drawing
  • US12450573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a controller configured to acquire an identifier of a vehicle upon receiving a request for customization of the vehicle, identify one or more parts with which the vehicle is already equipped by searching a vehicle database that stores data on parts with which a plurality of vehicles is equipped using the acquired identifier as a key, and determine a work item for the customization according to the one or more identified parts.