Vehicle Path Optimization for Emissions Mitigation in Dense Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in high-density zones, due to complex relationships between environmental variables and the need for computationally efficient predictive data analysis to generate optimized vehicle operation plans without negatively affecting other performance metrics.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning optimization model is used to determine emissions impact-optimized paths based on historical emissions data and environmental data, evaluated by validation engines to generate validated emissions impact-optimized paths for vehicle operations, considering factors like safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If complex environmental variables are analyzed to optimize emissions mitigation, then emissions reduction effectiveness is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions reduction effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing environmental data, pre-identifying high-density emissions zones, and pre-calculating mitigation strategies before vehicle operations commence. This allows complex emissions optimization to be prepared in advance, reducing real-time computational burden while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes environmental variables and translates them into optimized path recommendations. This intermediary layer manages the complexity by breaking down complex environmental analysis into manageable processing stages, balancing detailed analysis with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If real-time emissions optimization is implemented, then emissions impact is reduced, but system processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions impactVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of environmental conditions and pre-determines optimized paths before vehicle operations begin. By preparing emissions mitigation strategies in advance based on predicted environmental conditions, the system achieves real-time optimization without incurring real-time computational delays during actual vehicle operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of optimization based on operational context, environmental conditions, and time constraints. It flexibly balances between comprehensive real-time analysis and faster approximate solutions, adapting processing depth to maintain emissions reduction effectiveness while respecting time and computational resource constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If comprehensive validation is performed on optimized paths, then path reliability is improved, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath reliabilityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is segmented into multiple independent validation engines that each perform specific validation functions (e.g., path feasibility, emissions accuracy, operational constraints). This segmentation allows comprehensive validation to be distributed across modular components, improving reliability through thorough checking while managing complexity through organized modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engines are designed with multi-functionality, where each engine can validate multiple aspects of optimized paths using unified validation frameworks. This universality reduces overall system complexity by avoiding redundant validation logic while maintaining comprehensive path reliability through versatile validation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250297862A1Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products for emissions impact mitigation
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20250297862A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297862A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297862A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide techniques for generating emissions impact-optimized optimized paths. The techniques may include identifying input data set for a target vehicle operation, the input data set; determining using a machine learning optimization model, an emissions impact-optimized path based on the input data set and historical emissions impact data associated with a plurality of historical vehicle operations; evaluating the emissions impact-optimized path, based on one or more validation engines, to generate an evaluation output; and determining a validated emissions impact-optimized path for the target vehicle operation based on the emissions impact-optimized path and the evaluation output.