Self-Driving Vehicle Path Control for Autonomous Obstacle Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety mechanisms in mobile unmanned vehicles, such as emergency stops, are time-consuming and inefficient when obstacles are detected, requiring manual override to resume operation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for path control in self-driving vehicles that includes sensors and a processor to detect obstacles and initiate a redirection routine, reducing velocity and generating a new path to avoid obstacles, with a second fail-safe routine that adjusts operations to prevent emergency stops, allowing the vehicle to continue operating autonomously.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If emergency stop is triggered when obstacle is detected, then collision avoidance is achieved, but operation efficiency deteriorates due to manual override requirement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidoperation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle's control system automatically handles obstacle avoidance by generating alternative paths and adjusting velocity without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously recovering from obstacle detection scenarios, eliminating the need for operator override and maintaining continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The fail-safe routine dynamically adjusts vehicle operation by modifying velocity commands and generating alternative paths based on real-time obstacle detection. Instead of a static emergency stop, the system adaptively changes its behavior to navigate around obstacles while maintaining safe operating parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If vehicle velocity is reduced when obstacle is detected, then collision risk is minimized, but task completion time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision riskVSAvoidtask completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts velocity based on obstacle proximity and generates alternative paths that optimize the balance between safety and efficiency. Velocity reduction is applied selectively and temporarily only when necessary for safe navigation, rather than maintaining reduced speed for extended periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system proactively generates alternative paths and velocity adjustments before the vehicle reaches the obstacle, allowing smooth transitions that minimize disruption to overall task completion. The system prepares avoidance maneuvers in advance rather than reacting abruptly at the last moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11225275B2Method, system and apparatus for self-driving vehicle obstacle avoidance
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11225275B2 patent drawing
  • US11225275B2 patent drawing
  • US11225275B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for path control for a mobile unmanned vehicle in an environment is provided. The system includes: a sensor connected to the mobile unmanned vehicle; the mobile unmanned vehicle configured to initiate a first fail-safe routine responsive to detection of an object in a first sensor region adjacent to the sensor; and a processor connected to the mobile unmanned vehicle. The processor is configured to: generate a current path based on a map of the environment; based on the current path, issue velocity commands to cause the mobile unmanned vehicle to execute the current path; responsive to detection of an obstacle in a second sensor region, initiate a second fail-safe routine in the mobile unmanned vehicle to avoid entry of the obstacle into the first sensor region and initiation of the first fail-safe routine.