Autonomous Vehicle Path Verification for Realistic Simulation Scenarios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing simulation environments for autonomous vehicles struggle to accurately replicate real-world scenarios, particularly in modeling the behavior of actors such as other vehicles, pedestrians, and road conditions, leading to inefficiencies in testing and training systems.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for path verification in a simulation environment that allows users to mark vehicle trajectories, record control points, calculate path verification parameters, and provide alerts or modify paths to ensure adherence to kinematic and dynamic constraints, using feedback to enhance scenario generation and annotation tools for training planners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical world testing is used to evaluate sensor processing and control systems, then testing accuracy and realism are improved, but testing cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of the physical environment, vehicles, and sensors through detailed 3D modeling and simulation engines. These digital twins replicate real-world physics, sensor behaviors, and driving scenarios, enabling comprehensive testing without physical deployment. The simulation environment copies road geometries, weather conditions, and actor behaviors to maintain testing fidelity while eliminating time and cost constraints of physical testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If simulation environments are used to increase testing volume, then testing efficiency is improved, but realism and accuracy of scenario representation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidscenario realism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates multiple feedback mechanisms to ensure simulation realism. Sensor models provide feedback by simulating how real sensors would respond to virtual scenes, including noise, occlusions, and detection limitations. The physics engine provides feedback on vehicle dynamics, ensuring that simulated driving behavior matches real-world vehicle responses. This feedback loop allows rapid iteration while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation environment allows dynamic adjustment of numerous parameters including weather conditions, road surface properties, sensor characteristics, and actor behaviors. By systematically varying these parameters, the system can test edge cases and rare scenarios that would be impractical to recreate physically, while maintaining realistic relationships between parameters through physics-based models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complex actor behaviors are modeled in simulation, then scenario realism is improved, but computational complexity and system resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactor behavior realismVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation system segments actor behavior into modular components: perception modules that simulate sensor input, prediction modules that forecast future states, and planning modules that determine actions. Each actor type (vehicle, pedestrian, cyclist) has specialized behavior templates that can be independently configured and tested. This segmentation allows complex behaviors to be built from simpler, well-tested components, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12384406B2Systems for testing and training autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 FIVE AI LTD
  • US12384406B2 patent drawing
  • US12384406B2 patent drawing
  • US12384406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method of path verification in a computer system is described. A user provides input to mark a displayed image of a scenario. A path is generated representing the trajectory of a vehicle. Control points along the path are recorded, each control point associated with a vehicle position and target speed. A vehicle position end target speed of two control points is used to calculate at least one path verification parameter which defines how a vehicle travelling along the path would behave. The at least one verification parameter is compared with a corresponding threshold value; and an alert is generated to the user at the user interface when the at least one path verification parameter exceeds the corresponding threshold value.