Vehicle Power Branch Control for Voltage Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle power systems face challenges in stabilizing voltage supply, particularly due to dynamic consumers causing voltage dips, which can impair vehicle operations and lead to undesirable side effects like lighting malfunctions, and previous solutions involve high costs, complex power components, and safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A method and control unit that dynamically manage power between multiple on-board power system branches using switching devices and a supervisory unit to disconnect critical branches and connect backup power stores, ensuring stable voltage supply without additional power components, thus preventing overcharging and component damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a further energy store is provided besides the customary rechargeable battery to absorb voltage dips, then voltage stabilization is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to additional power components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage stabilizationVSAvoidpower components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple energy stores (capacitor and rechargeable battery) into a single on-board power system that shares common control and monitoring infrastructure. The control unit manages both energy sources, allowing them to work together as an integrated system rather than separate systems, thereby reducing overall complexity while maintaining voltage stabilization capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it monitors the state of charge of both the capacitor and rechargeable battery, manages power distribution, detects critical supply states, and controls switching between different power sources. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate control systems for each energy store, reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a changeover switch is used to switch between battery and second energy store, then voltage dip backup is improved, but safety risk increases due to potential overcharging and component destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage dip backupVSAvoidovercharging risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the state of charge of both the capacitor and rechargeable battery, creating a feedback mechanism that prevents overcharging. When the capacitor reaches full charge, the control unit automatically prevents further charging current, and when the battery reaches critical charge levels, the system switches to the capacitor as the primary energy source, eliminating the risk of component destruction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for potential overcharging risks by implementing preventive measures: the control unit monitors charge levels in advance and switches between energy sources before critical thresholds are reached. This proactive approach cushioning against potential damage before it can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If high capacity rechargeable batteries are used to absorb voltage spikes and dips, then voltage stabilization is improved, but weight and space requirement increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage stabilizationVSAvoidbattery weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the energy storage function into two distinct components: a capacitor for handling rapid voltage spikes and dips, and a rechargeable battery for providing sustained energy. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, enabling the use of a smaller, lighter battery while maintaining overall voltage stabilization capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by introducing a capacitor with high power density for rapid response to voltage fluctuations, complementing the battery's high energy density. This parameter diversification allows the battery to be smaller and lighter since it doesn't need to handle rapid discharge/charge cycles alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic consumers like starter motor are activated during vehicle operation, then vehicle functionality is improved, but voltage dip severity increases affecting sensitive consumers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operation flexibilityVSAvoidsensitive consumer operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The capacitor acts as an intermediary energy buffer between the starter motor (dynamic consumer) and sensitive consumers. When the starter motor is activated, the capacitor absorbs the resulting voltage dip and provides immediate supplemental power to sensitive consumers, isolating them from the disturbance while allowing the starter motor to operate freely

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9806522B2Method for the controlled connection of a plurality of on-board power system branches of a vehicle, control unit for carrying out the method and on-board power system
Publication Date: 2017.10.31 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US9806522B2 patent drawing
  • US9806522B2 patent drawing
  • US9806522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlled connection of a plurality of on-board power system branches is disclosed, wherein electrical power is exchanged between first and third on-board power system branches if an uncritical supply state is present and electrical power is exchanged between second and the third on-board power system branches if a critical supply state is present in the first or third on-board power system branch. In a critical supply state, the first on-board power system branch is disconnected from the third on-board power system branch by opening a first switching device, and the second on-board power system branch is then connected to the third on-board power system branch via a second switching device. A second actuation device that actuates the second switching device receives a switch state signal from the first actuation device and closes the second switching device only if the received signal signals an open first switching device.