Vehicle Power Control for Peak Load Voltage Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles face issues with low voltage due to high-power electronic components consuming power rapidly, leading to potential operational stoppages and accidents from faults in drive devices and electronic components, where it is difficult to distinguish between power supply faults and component faults.

Innovation Solution

A power control device that communicates with a battery management system to determine peak power generation and control high-voltage load outputs, decreasing them during peak power and increasing them when necessary, based on travel time and speed information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If high-power electronic components are operated continuously, then convenience and comfort for passengers is improved, but voltage supplied to components rapidly decreases causing operational stoppages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience and comfort for passengersVSAvoidvoltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The power control device performs preliminary action by predicting peak power generation before it occurs, using machine learning models trained on historical power consumption data. This allows the system to proactively adjust power distribution and prevent voltage drops before they cause operational stoppages, maintaining both passenger comfort and voltage stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring actual power consumption, comparing it with predicted values, and adjusting power distribution in real-time. The machine learning model is also continuously trained on new data, creating a feedback loop that improves prediction accuracy and maintains voltage stability while supporting high-power component operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If power control is not implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but faults in drive devices and electronic components cannot be distinguished between power supply issues and component failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control system complexityVSAvoidfault diagnosis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The power control device acts as an intermediary between the battery management system and electronic components. It introduces detailed power consumption monitoring and prediction capabilities that enable fault diagnosis without requiring complex changes to the existing system architecture. The machine learning model serves as a mediator that analyzes power patterns to distinguish between power supply faults and component failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service fault diagnosis by automatically analyzing power consumption patterns and identifying the nature of faults without requiring external intervention or complex additional hardware. The machine learning model autonomously determines whether faults are caused by power supply issues or component failures, maintaining reliability while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If peak power generation is not managed, then ease of operation is maintained, but accidents may occur due to faults in drive devices and electronic components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidaccident risk from faults
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The power control device applies preliminary anti-action by predicting peak power generation and potential faults before they occur. The machine learning model analyzes historical data to identify patterns that precede accidents or component failures, allowing the system to take preventive measures such as adjusting power distribution or alerting operators, thereby reducing accident risk while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback control to continuously monitor power consumption patterns and compare them against predicted values. When deviations indicate potential faults or unsafe conditions, the system automatically adjusts power distribution or generates alerts, creating a feedback loop that prevents accidents while maintaining simple operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230398899A1Power control device and vehicle having the same
Publication Date: 2023.12.14 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230398899A1 patent drawing
  • US20230398899A1 patent drawing
  • US20230398899A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The vehicle includes a battery, a load receive a voltage higher than or equal to a preset voltage from the battery, a controller controls an operation of the load, a battery management system monitors a total amount of power output from the battery, and a power control device determines whether peak power is generated based on the total amount of power and an amount of peak power, controls the load so that an output of the load is decreased when it is determined that the peak power has been generated, and controls the load so that the output of the load is increased when it is determined that the generation of the peak power has been released.