Vehicle Propulsion System Optimizing Battery Charging Power Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hybrid and electric vehicle propulsion systems face inefficiencies due to oversized batteries, aggressive thermal management, and lack of predictive control over battery degradation, leading to increased size, weight, cost, and reduced operating efficiency, as well as suboptimal DC link voltage management.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle propulsion system with a controller that optimizes charging power allocation for energy storage devices using a multi-objective optimization algorithm, dynamically controls DC bus voltage, and adjusts power split between energy storage units to maximize state of charge and health, and system efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If batteries are oversized to reduce power and cyclic stresses, then reliability is improved, but weight and volume increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery reliabilityVSAvoidbattery weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic battery sizing that adapts to actual vehicle usage patterns and driving conditions. The system monitors real-time operational data and adjusts the effective battery capacity and power management strategy accordingly, allowing the battery to operate optimally without being permanently oversized, thus reducing weight while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as charge-discharge rates, voltage thresholds, and power allocation dynamically based on actual stress conditions. By adjusting these parameters in real-time, the battery can handle variable loads without requiring excessive capacity margins, reducing overall battery size while maintaining reliability under normal operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If aggressive thermal management controls are implemented, then battery lifespan is extended, but system complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifespanVSAvoidthermal management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-regulating thermal management system that uses passive thermal pathways and control algorithms to maintain battery temperature within optimal ranges. The system monitors battery state and automatically adjusts cooling/heating activation and intensity based on actual thermal conditions, avoiding continuous aggressive management while extending battery lifespan through intelligent, condition-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Power

If multiple energy storage sources are incorporated, then power density is increased, but system size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the energy storage system into multiple functional units with different power and energy characteristics. By dividing the system into modular components that can be independently sized and configured, the overall power density is increased without requiring a single oversized battery, thus managing system weight more effectively through distributed architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If optimization algorithms are applied to charging power allocation, then state of charge and health are optimized, but computational requirements and control complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate of charge optimizationVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback-based optimization where the control system continuously monitors battery state of charge, state of health, and charging conditions, then adjusts charging power allocation in real-time based on this feedback. This closed-loop approach optimizes battery performance without requiring overly complex open-loop control algorithms, using iterative adjustment based on measured outcomes to achieve optimal charging strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9889752B2Vehicle propulsion system having an energy storage system and optimized method of controlling operation thereof
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 BUNKER HILL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9889752B2 patent drawing
  • US9889752B2 patent drawing
  • US9889752B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A charging system for a vehicle includes a first energy storage device, a first DC-DC converter coupled between a DC bus and the first energy storage device, and a controller. The controller is programmed to identify charging parameters of a charging source coupleable to the first energy storage device through the first DC-DC converter, apply an optimization algorithm to iteratively define a charging power allocation to charge the first energy storage device using the charging source, and selectively control the first DC-DC converter to recharge the first energy storage device in accordance with the charging power allocation. The charging power allocation optimizes at least one of a state of charge (SOC) and a state of health (SOH) of the first energy storage device.