Vehicle Passenger Protection Sensor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle restraint systems rely on upfront sensors in the crumple zone, which are prone to deformation during frontal crashes, limiting their accuracy in detecting accident scenarios and triggering passenger protection measures effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implementing 2-channel sensors at different locations in the vehicle to detect physical variables in multiple directions, allowing for precise analysis of accident scenarios and accurate activation of passenger protection systems by combining sensor signal values and threshold values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If upfront sensors are installed in the crumple zone to detect frontal crashes quickly, then the detection speed is improved, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to sensor deformation during crashes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is segmented into multiple independent sensors positioned at different locations (frontal, lateral, longitudinal directions) rather than relying on a single upfront sensor. This segmentation allows the system to distribute the measurement function across multiple points, reducing the impact of deformation on any single sensor while maintaining fast detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement approach transitions from single-direction (longitudinal only) to multi-dimensional sensing by adding sensors that detect acceleration in lateral and vertical directions. This dimensional expansion enables the system to capture complex crash scenarios from multiple angles, improving measurement precision without sacrificing detection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors at different locations are used to improve accident scenario analysis, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident scenario analysis precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each sensor is designed as a multi-functional unit capable of detecting acceleration in multiple directions (longitudinal, lateral, vertical) simultaneously. This universality reduces the total number of sensors needed compared to having separate single-direction sensors, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple sensing functions (acceleration detection in x, y, z directions) into integrated sensor units positioned at strategic locations. By merging these functions into unified sensor assemblies rather than using separate sensors for each direction, the system reduces overall complexity while achieving comprehensive accident scenario analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If 2-channel sensors detecting multiple physical variables are implemented, then the reliability of passenger protection activation is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger protection activation reliabilityVSAvoidsensor installation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs sensors with different orientation characteristics at different vehicle locations, optimizing each sensor's sensing capability for its specific position and expected crash scenario. This local quality approach allows the system to achieve high reliability through strategic sensor orientation rather than requiring uniform high-precision installation across all sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes sensors that detect multiple physical variables (acceleration in multiple directions) and processes these parameters through evaluation algorithms that determine activation conditions. By changing from single-parameter to multi-parameter detection and using algorithmic evaluation, the system achieves high activation reliability while accommodating reasonable manufacturing tolerances through software-based threshold adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9475442B2Method and device for triggering at least one passenger protection means of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2016.10.25 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9475442B2 patent drawing
  • US9475442B2 patent drawing
  • US9475442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for triggering a passenger protection unit of a vehicle includes: reading in a first and a second sensor signal value of a first sensor, which is situated at a first location in the vehicle; reading in a third and a fourth sensor signal value of a second sensor, which is situated at a second location in the vehicle which is different from the first location; and activating the passenger protection unit using the first, second, third and fourth sensor signal values. The first and third sensor signal values represent a physical variable detected in a first sensor direction, and the second and fourth sensor signal values represent a second physical value detected in a second sensor direction which is different from the first sensor direction.