Personalized Vehicle Recommender System Using Neural Network Enrichment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current recommender systems are inadequate for vehicle purchases due to the complexity of vehicle market dynamics, limited user action data, and asymmetry of information, making it difficult to provide accurate and personalized vehicle recommendations that account for driving habits, financial constraints, location, and preferences.

Innovation Solution

A personalized vehicle recommender system utilizing a neural network that generates recommendations by enriching driver profile data with location and social characteristic data, and combining this with vehicle attribute data to provide tailored suggestions, incorporating deep learning methods for adaptive and flexible recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional recommender systems (collaborative filtering or content-based filtering) are used for vehicle recommendations, then the system structure remains simple, but the recommendation accuracy deteriorates due to limited user action data and asymmetry of information in the vehicle market

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the recommendation task into multiple independent modules: user behavior analysis module, vehicle attribute analysis module, market dynamics module, and recommendation generation module. Each module processes specific aspects independently, allowing complex analysis without overwhelming system complexity. The segmentation enables parallel processing and modular improvement of individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of vehicle market dynamics modeling that mediates between user preferences and vehicle recommendations. This intermediary layer captures the complex relationships in the vehicle market (depreciation, supply-demand, seasonality) and translates them into factors that influence recommendations, thereby improving accuracy without directly complicating the core recommendation engine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more user data and vehicle attributes are collected to improve personalization, then recommendation relevance improves, but information processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing vehicle attributes, user profiles, and market dynamics data in structured formats before recommendation generation. User behavior patterns are pre-analyzed and vehicle market conditions are pre-modeled, so that during actual recommendation requests, the system only needs to retrieve and combine pre-computed results rather than processing raw data from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the weight and detail level of different data sources based on recommendation context. For example, when user history is rich, the system weights behavioral data higher; when vehicle market conditions change rapidly, it increases the weight of market dynamics parameters. This adaptive parameter adjustment optimizes processing efficiency while maintaining personalization quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system accounts for vehicle market dynamics (depreciation, supply-demand, seasonality) in recommendations, then recommendation practical value improves, but the model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation practical valueVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by modeling vehicle market conditions as time-varying parameters rather than static attributes. Vehicle depreciation is modeled as a function of age and mileage, supply-demand relationships are updated based on current market data, and seasonal effects are captured through time-dependent weighting. This dynamic modeling approach captures real market behavior while using parametric models that remain computationally tractable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12008455B2Personalized vehicle recommender system
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 DRIVERBASE INC
  • US12008455B2 patent drawing
  • US12008455B2 patent drawing
  • US12008455B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle recommender system includes a storage system storing a trained neural network trained to generate a vehicle recommendation, a vehicle database comprising vehicle attribute data, and a driver database comprising driver profile data. A processing system communicates with the storage system and is configured to generate enriched driver profile data by comparing user-generated driver profile data to the location characteristic data and social characteristic data. The processing system calculates a driver attribute target value for each vehicle attribute category in a list of vehicle attribute categories based on the driver profile data, and then generates, using the trained neural network, at least one vehicle recommendation based on at least the vehicle attribute data and the driver attribute target values.