Vehicle Video Recorder Evaluation Using Robotic GUI Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing evaluation methods for built-in camera systems in vehicles are inefficient and inaccurate due to manual verification processes, which lack automation and precision, especially in assessing video recording quality and GUI performance under varying environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system that automates the evaluation of built-in video recording devices for vehicles, utilizing a GUI test part with an articulated robot and electrostatic touch unit to simulate user interactions and a camera test part to evaluate camera performance, allowing for quantitative assessment without the need for actual vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual verification is performed on actual vehicles, then evaluation can be conducted with simple equipment, but work efficiency is lowered and evaluation accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework efficiencyVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical verification operations with an automated robot arm system that performs precise positioning and touching operations on the display screen. The robot arm is controlled by a computer to automatically navigate through GUI elements, eliminating human labor while maintaining or improving measurement precision through consistent, programmable movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computer as an intermediary between the evaluator and the actual vehicle. The computer processes image data from the display, determines touch positions, controls the robot arm movements, and automates the evaluation workflow, thereby improving both efficiency and accuracy without requiring direct human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated evaluation is implemented, then work efficiency and accuracy are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the robot arm system to perform multiple functions: positioning, touching, and navigating the display screen. The same robot arm and control system are used for various evaluation tasks, making the complex system versatile and justifying the complexity through multi-functional capability that improves overall evaluation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automatic image processing and position determination algorithms that enable the evaluation system to self-correct and self-navigate. The computer automatically processes captured images to determine precise touch positions without human intervention, reducing the operational complexity despite the increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If quantitative evaluation is performed, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but it requires complex automated systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective manual evaluation with objective automated measurement systems. The robot arm executes precise, programmable movements to interact with the display, and the computer systematically records and analyzes evaluation data, transforming qualitative manual assessment into quantitative automated measurement that improves accuracy while managing complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enhances the accuracy and reliability of evaluating built-in camera systems by enabling automated testing of GUI performance and camera functionality under various conditions, reducing human error and improving work efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an electrostatic touch unit connected to the articulated robot so as to be movable by the articulated robot and configured to electrostatically touch the GUI screen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic touch: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS12063347B2System for evaluating built-in video recording device for vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12063347B2 patent drawing
  • US12063347B2 patent drawing
  • US12063347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a system for evaluating a built-in video recording device for a vehicle, the system including: a GUI (graphical user interface) test part configured to automatically perform evaluation of a GUI screen of a vehicle display device that operates in conjunction with the built-in video recording device for a vehicle; and an automatic evaluating part configured to automatically evaluate performance of the built-in video recording device for a vehicle based on a result evaluated by the GUI test part.