Vehicle Reservation Priority Reassignment for Car Sharing Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current car sharing services lack the ability to effectively prioritize and manage vehicle reservations based on user importance levels, leading to inefficiencies in vehicle allocation.

Innovation Solution

A server and terminal apparatus system that determines the importance level of reservation requests, compares it with existing reservations, and assigns vehicles from lower-priority reservations when no vehicles are available, ensuring that high-priority users are allocated vehicles even when all vehicles are reserved.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If vehicles are assigned to reservations in first-come-first-served order, then vehicle allocation is simple and fast, but high-priority users cannot access vehicles when all vehicles are reserved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle allocation simplicityVSAvoidvehicle access guarantee for high-priority users
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the allocation parameter from simple chronological order to importance-based priority levels. Reservation requests are assigned importance levels (e.g., high, medium, low) and vehicles are allocated based on these levels rather than arrival time, ensuring high-priority users can access vehicles even when fully reserved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle allocation system becomes dynamic by allowing reassignment based on changing priority needs. When a high-priority user requests a vehicle, the system can dynamically transfer vehicles from lower-priority reservations, making the allocation flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If vehicles are reassigned from lower-priority reservations to high-priority users, then high-priority user access is improved, but reservation management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle access guarantee for high-priority usersVSAvoidreservation management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reservation management system is segmented into distinct priority levels (high, medium, low). This segmentation allows the system to manage allocations hierarchically, where each priority level is handled separately, simplifying the overall management despite the added complexity of priority-based allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary that manages the complex priority-based allocation logic. It receives reservation requests, determines importance levels, and automatically performs vehicle reassignment without requiring direct user intervention, thereby managing complexity centrally rather than distributed across multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If all vehicles are reserved for lower-priority users, then lower-priority reservations are fulfilled, but high-priority users experience waiting time and reduced service quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle utilization rateVSAvoidwaiting time for high-priority users
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of reservation importance levels before finalizing vehicle assignments. By evaluating and prioritizing requests in advance, the system can proactively allocate vehicles to high-priority users before they experience waiting, rather than reacting after delays occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where reservation importance levels are continuously evaluated and vehicle allocations are adjusted accordingly. When high-priority users request vehicles, the system provides feedback by reassigning vehicles from lower-priority reservations, reducing waiting time while maintaining overall vehicle utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11922339B2Server, non-transitory computer readable medium, and terminal apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11922339B2 patent drawing
  • US11922339B2 patent drawing
  • US11922339B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A server includes a communication interface and a controller. The controller receives a reservation request for a vehicle from a first user via the communication interface, determines an importance level of the reservation request, and generates first reservation information for a vehicle to be used by the first user, the first reservation information including the importance level. In a case in which there is no vehicle to assign to the first reservation information, the controller compares the importance level of the reservation request with importance levels of other reservation information that already exists, and assigns, to the first reservation information, a vehicle that has been assigned to second reservation information which is from among the other reservation information and includes an importance level lower than the importance level of the reservation request.