Vehicle Interior Retaining Device with Adhesive Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing holding devices for vehicle interiors risk damaging vehicle walls due to low structural rigidity, as they require significant prestress to secure objects, which can deform the walls and compromise the hold.

Innovation Solution

A holding device with plate-shaped support members featuring a hook-and-loop fastener system that allows secure attachment without prestress, using flexible adhesive fastener mats and a conical plug-in socket to absorb transverse forces and accommodate uneven wall contours, ensuring stability and easy detachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a retaining strut is tightened to secure objects, then the holding force is improved, but the vehicle walls may deform or be damaged due to low structural rigidity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidwall deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces adhesive fastener surfaces as an intermediary between the retaining strut and vehicle walls. These adhesive surfaces distribute the mounting forces over a larger area, preventing concentration of stress that would deform soft vehicle walls while maintaining secure attachment. The adhesive layer acts as a mediator that transfers loads without damaging the wall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and distribution of mounting forces by using adhesive bonding instead of mechanical fastening. The adhesive fastener surfaces transform point loads into distributed area loads, fundamentally changing how forces are transmitted to the vehicle walls and preventing deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If adhesive fastener surfaces are used for mounting, then wall damage is prevented, but the fastening strength may be insufficient for heavy loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewall damage preventionVSAvoidfastening strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple fastening mechanisms into a single integrated system. Adhesive fastener surfaces are merged with mechanical interlocking elements (such as hooks, loops, or complementary geometric features) to create a hybrid mounting system that leverages both the distributed load distribution of adhesives and the high strength of mechanical engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system uses composite construction, combining adhesive materials with mechanical fastening components. This composite approach allows the system to exhibit both the gentle, distributed attachment characteristics of adhesives and the high strength properties of mechanical fasteners, resolving the contradiction between wall protection and load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If the rod structure is made rigid to maintain shape, then structural stability is improved, but adaptability to uneven wall contours is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to uneven contours
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the mounting system into separate functional segments: rigid structural components (rod, support members) maintain overall stability, while flexible adhesive layers and compliant mounting interfaces provide adaptation to surface irregularities. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs flexible adhesive fastener surfaces and thin compliant layers between rigid components. These flexible elements conform to uneven wall contours while the rigid rod structure maintains its structural integrity and load-bearing capability, resolving the contradiction between rigidity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the support members are made large to distribute forces, then wall protection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce distributionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs support members that serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide structural support, distribute mounting forces over large areas to protect walls, and incorporate adhesive fastening surfaces for secure attachment. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate components for each function, reducing overall device complexity while achieving force distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides secure and damage-free attachment of holding struts to vehicle walls, even in areas with low structural rigidity, by distributing forces effectively and allowing for adjustable length and modular design, enhancing the usability and safety of the holding device.

Implementation Method 1

one or both support members being assigned a hook-and-loop fastener device with hook-and-loop fastener surfaces that can be releasably connected to one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHook-and-loop fastener mechanism: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

for detachable adhesive connection with the first adhesive closure surface provided second adhesive closure surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

the support member has a fastening plate on the front side of which, facing away from the rod structure, the first touch-and-close fastener surface is arranged and which has flexible properties such that it can be used to release the adhesive connection between the two touch-and-close fastener surfaces by bending and pulling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2164724B1Retaining device for vehicle interiors
Publication Date: 2019.01.09 TANOS VERPACKEN ORDNEN PRASENTIEREN
  • EP2164724B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2164724B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2164724B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A retaining device which can be fitted in a vehicle interior (1), in particular as part of a storage system, is proposed. Said retaining device contains at least one retaining strut (6) with a length-adjustable rod structure (13) and two plate-like supporting elements (14) attached to the end sides thereof. The supporting elements (14) can be fixed to the vehicle walls (7, 8) by a respective adhesive fastening device (45). This results in a secure support for the retaining struts (6) without it being necessary to brace the retaining struts (6) fixedly between the vehicle walls (7, 8).