Vehicle Kinematic Risk Scoring for Personalized Safety Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional vehicle analytics are inaccurate and insufficient for generating accurate heuristics for vehicle and driver behavior, leading to unfair risk allocation in usage-based insurance and failing to provide effective driving feedback or improvement opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize kinematic data to generate safety indices, combining them into a personalized speed threshold and enhancing vehicle condition optimization, while allowing for asynchronous data collection and analysis from diverse sources to create a FAIR score for dynamic risk rating, ensuring privacy and accuracy in risk management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional simple tracking of distances traveled is used for usage-based insurance, then data collection is simple and easy to implement, but the accuracy and reliability of risk assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data collectionVSAvoidaccuracy of risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources including telematics data, sensor data from the vehicle, and environmental data to create a comprehensive risk assessment model. This merging of diverse data streams transforms simple distance tracking into a multi-dimensional analysis that captures driving behavior, vehicle conditions, and contextual factors, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining ease of data collection through integrated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal data collection framework that can accommodate multiple types of data sources (telematics, sensors, environmental data) through a single platform. This multi-functional approach allows the same infrastructure to collect and process various data types for comprehensive risk assessment, resolving the contradiction by making the system both easy to implement and highly accurate simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If more data is collected and shared about drivers and vehicles for usage-based insurance, then risk assessment accuracy improves, but privacy issues and data security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk assessmentVSAvoidprivacy issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer that processes and anonymizes data before sharing it with insurance carriers. This intermediary system aggregates individual driver data into fleet-level analytics, removing personally identifiable information while preserving risk assessment accuracy. The intermediary acts as a buffer that enables accurate risk modeling without exposing individual privacy, thus resolving the contradiction between data accuracy and privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of data processing and sharing to different types of information. Sensitive personal data is anonymized and aggregated, while vehicle operational data is shared at individual levels when necessary for assessment. This localized approach to data quality and privacy protection allows the system to maintain accuracy where needed while protecting privacy where sensitive, resolving the contradiction through differentiated data handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If traditional usage-based insurance only tracks distance traveled, then implementation is simple, but it fails to provide actionable feedback to improve driving behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of implementationVSAvoidlack of driving behavior insight
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where collected data is analyzed and returned to drivers as actionable insights. The system processes telematics and sensor data to identify specific driving behaviors, provides real-time or near-real-time feedback to drivers about their performance, and offers recommendations for improvement. This feedback mechanism transforms the system from simple tracking to a behavioral improvement tool while maintaining implementation simplicity through automated analysis and communication channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive vehicle and driver data is collected for accurate risk assessment, then insurance pricing becomes more accurate, but data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of insurance pricingVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive risk assessment model into modular components that process different data types independently. The system divides data processing into discrete analytical modules (telematics analysis, sensor data processing, environmental factor integration) that can be executed separately and whose results are combined. This segmentation reduces computational complexity by avoiding monolithic processing while maintaining the precision benefits of comprehensive data analysis through structured, incremental computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11836802B2Vehicle operation analytics, feedback, and enhancement
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 SPEEDGAUGE INC
  • US11836802B2 patent drawing
  • US11836802B2 patent drawing
  • US11836802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to methods and apparatus for controlling a vehicle based on motion or kinematic data received by a computer when the behavior of a driver is being monitored. Such methods and apparatus may generate one or more safety indices that may include a driver score, a vehicle safety score, and/or an environment safety score. These safety indices may optionally be weighted and combined into an overall safety score, grade, or index. The safety scores or indices may be used to generate a personalized speed threshold or acceleration threshold for a vehicle and/or a driver of the vehicle. Methods and apparatus consistent with the present disclosure may result in the speed of a vehicle being reduced, an increase in vehicle location accuracy, or functions such as headlights or windshield wipers or automated driving assistance being turned on to increase safety.