Vehicle Route Optimization System for Fuel Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inefficient vehicle operation due to rapid acceleration/deceleration and suboptimal engine speed management leads to increased fuel consumption and operating costs in the trucking industry, despite advancements in fuel efficiency technologies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that calculates an optimized vehicle route and operational profile based on GPS data and vehicle attributes, monitoring parameters like acceleration, speed, and gear selection to prompt operators for efficient driving practices or automatically adjust vehicle systems for better fuel efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If vehicle operators accelerate and decelerate rapidly to complete trips faster, then productivity increases, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip completion speedVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates optimized routes and determines optimal speed profiles before the vehicle departs. By having the optimal path and speed strategy ready in advance, the operator can maintain efficient speeds without rapid acceleration/deceleration while still meeting delivery deadlines, thus improving productivity without excessive fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual vehicle speed, location, and operating conditions, comparing them against the pre-calculated optimal profile. Real-time feedback is provided to the operator through the display interface, guiding speed adjustments to maintain optimal fuel efficiency while progressing along the optimized route, balancing productivity and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If vehicle operators maintain higher speeds to reduce travel time, then productivity increases, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel time reductionVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the optimal speed parameter based on multiple factors including vehicle load, route characteristics, weather conditions, and traffic patterns. By continuously optimizing the speed parameter rather than using fixed high speeds, the system achieves productive travel times while minimizing fuel consumption at each moment of the journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The optimized route and speed profile are not static but adapt dynamically to changing conditions during travel. The system recalculates and adjusts the optimal path and speed recommendations in real-time based on current vehicle parameters and environmental conditions, allowing productivity maintenance with reduced energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If suboptimal engine speed is maintained to simplify operation, then ease of operation increases, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors vehicle parameters including engine speed, load conditions, and operating state, and provides real-time recommendations for optimal engine speed adjustments. This allows the vehicle to self-optimize its fuel consumption without requiring the operator to manually manage complex engine parameters, maintaining ease of operation while reducing fuel usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual engine management with electronic monitoring and computational optimization. Sensors and processors automatically track vehicle state and calculate optimal engine speeds, substituting complex mechanical judgment with electronic control systems that provide simple guidance to the operator, improving fuel efficiency without complicating operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9026343B2Systems and methods for improving the efficiency of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 PACCAR INC
  • US9026343B2 patent drawing
  • US9026343B2 patent drawing
  • US9026343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Operational efficiency and/or control systems and methods for vehicles are provided in order to improve fuel efficiency when traveling in a fuel powered vehicle from point A to point B. The systems and methods can determine the “best” or most efficient route to take based on one or more priorities, make driving recommendations to the operator, and/or automatically control one or more systems (e.g., engine, brakes, transmission, etc.) of the vehicle. The systems and methods can calculate the “best” route based on predefined trip requirements, including cost, schedule, route preferences, and/or risk of potential delays, etc.