Vehicle Route Guidance Computer for Commute Risk Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies fail to effectively analyze and optimize motor vehicle commuting routes for risk reduction and efficiency, which can impact insurance premium calculations and driver behavior guidance.

Innovation Solution

A system that stores and analyzes commuting route data to provide personalized insurance quotes and real-time driving guidance by integrating telematics information, traffic conditions, and risk incident data, allowing for optimized route planning and safety enhancements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive telematics data collection and analysis systems are implemented, then insurance underwriting precision and risk assessment accuracy are improved, but system complexity and implementation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderwriting precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments telematics data collection into multiple independent components: vehicle sensors (accelerometers, GPS, engine sensors), communication modules, and data processing algorithms. Each component performs a specific function (location tracking, speed monitoring, collision detection), and results are aggregated for comprehensive risk assessment. This modular approach improves measurement precision while managing system complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The telematics system is designed with multi-functionality to justify its complexity: it simultaneously provides insurance underwriting data, real-time driver feedback, collision warning, emergency response coordination, and premium calculation. This universal application of the system across multiple functions maximizes the value proposition despite the increased device complexity and implementation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If real-time route guidance and driver behavior monitoring are provided, then driver safety and commuting efficiency are improved, but data processing requirements and communication bandwidth increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical safety-related data elements for real-time processing (collision signals, emergency braking events, severe acceleration/deceleration patterns) while storing complete historical datasets separately. This extraction approach enables rapid real-time response for driver safety without overwhelming data processing requirements, as only essential safety parameters require immediate analysis and communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and aggregation of telematics data onboard the vehicle before transmission to remote servers. Critical safety events are immediately identified and flagged, while routine driving data is batched for later analysis. This preliminary processing reduces the volume of data requiring real-time communication bandwidth while maintaining comprehensive safety monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed commuting route analysis and risk factor identification are performed, then insurance premium accuracy and customer personalization are improved, but computational resources and analysis time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepremium accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic premium calculation that adapts to changing driving patterns and risk factors. Instead of static annual premiums, the system continuously updates risk assessments based on real-time telematics data, allowing premiums to reflect actual driving behavior changes. This dynamic approach improves premium accuracy by capturing temporal variations in driver behavior while optimizing analysis time through incremental updates rather than complete re-evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used in risk assessment from traditional static factors (age, vehicle type, location) to dynamic behavioral parameters (acceleration patterns, braking intensity, speed variability, route deviation). This parameter transformation enables more accurate premium calculation that reflects actual driving risk while optimizing computational efficiency by focusing on key behavioral metrics rather than analyzing all possible variables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11501376B2Remote system and method for vehicle route guidance
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
  • US11501376B2 patent drawing
  • US11501376B2 patent drawing
  • US11501376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle route guidance computer system is configured to store habitual travel routes for drivers; detect driving by a vehicle of one of the drivers along one of the habitual travel routes; monitor vehicle location along the route; monitor traffic signal states and traffic conditions along the route; calculate an optimal velocity of the vehicle to maximize likelihood of reaching a next traffic signal along the route when the signal is green, and transmit a guidance signal to a guidance device in a vehicle to advise the driver to decelerate or accelerate the vehicle. The vehicle route guidance computer system may be further configured to detect an adverse condition along the route, calculate an alternative route, and transmit a direction guidance signal to the guidance device for guiding the driver to the alternative route.