Vehicle Safe with Remote Access Control and Reversible Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle lock systems lack secure and portable solutions that prevent theft, as they are either not resistant to breach or can be easily removed and opened by thieves, and do not provide easy access for authorized users.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle safe with a remote access system, made of plate steel, featuring a recessed door and reversible mounting to a vehicle baseplate, using a fob for keyless entry and a two-stage security system, including a GPS tracker for location monitoring and an auxiliary power source for continued operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional locked compartments are used in vehicles, then valuables are protected to some extent, but the compartments are not resistant to breach and can be easily accessed via interior release mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidbreach resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle security system is divided into two independent parts: the vehicle's original locking mechanism and the separate secure container with its own independent locking system. This segmentation ensures that compromising the vehicle's locking system does not provide access to the valuables inside the container.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The secure container is nested within the vehicle's interior space, creating a container-within-a-container configuration. The container has its own walls, locking mechanism, and security features independent of the vehicle's structure, providing layered security where the inner container protects valuables even if the outer vehicle compartment is breached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If traditional safes are made portable for easy access, then they are easily removed by thieves and become targets for theft

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidtheft deterrence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The container is pre-installed and securely mounted to the vehicle's structure before use. The mounting system includes structural attachments that make removal difficult without specialized tools or significant force, so the preparatory mounting action prevents easy theft while maintaining accessibility during authorized use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A remote wireless communication system acts as an intermediary between the authorized user and the container's locking mechanism. The user can lock, unlock, and monitor the container remotely via wireless signals, eliminating the need for physical contact with the container while maintaining secure access control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If locked containers are made permanent to prevent removal, then they cannot be easily transported or exchanged between vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting system transitions between two states: a locked state where the container is securely attached to the vehicle structure, and an unlocked state where it can be easily removed. The dynamic mounting mechanism allows the container to be firmly fixed during normal use but readily removable when needed, adapting to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The container can be temporarily 'discarded' from one vehicle and 'recovered' in another. The standardized mounting interface allows the container to be removed from its current vehicle and reinstalled in a different vehicle, providing versatility for users who need to secure valuables in multiple vehicles without being permanently bound to one location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Ease of operation

If remote access systems are added to safes, then authorized access is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote accessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical locking system is supplemented or replaced with an electronic locking mechanism controlled by wireless signals. This substitution allows remote operation of the lock through electronic communication, enabling authorized access without physical presence while integrating seamlessly with the existing mechanical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The remote access system uses universal wireless communication protocols that can interface with various mobile devices and control systems. The system performs multiple functions including remote locking, unlocking, status monitoring, and alarm notification, consolidating these capabilities into a single integrated control interface that reduces overall system complexity despite the added functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11682252B1Vehicle safe with remote access control
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 NUCCIO EDWARD F
  • US11682252B1 patent drawing
  • US11682252B1 patent drawing
  • US11682252B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote access locking system and transportable secure containers are provided with a wireless key fob and optional tamper alarm, location transponder and reversible coupling to secure the container to a vehicle element or to a mounting plate that is fixed to the vehicle. The wireless fob sends wireless command signals to a controller that authenticates the signal and locks or unlocks the container door. The controller may also have a sound generator configured to produce a characteristic chirp when the lock is locked or unlocked by the controller that is different from the vehicle door chirp. The wireless fob for the container may stand alone or have a coupling joining the container fob with a conventional wireless entry fob for a vehicle. The system may also use secondary security measures such as RFID tags for two step authentication.