Vehicle Score Tracking System for Predictive Value Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle analysis systems fail to provide comprehensive and timely insights into a used vehicle's history and future value, making it difficult for owners and interested parties to determine the vehicle's longevity, optimal sale time, and potential declines in value.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates and tracks vehicle scores over a vehicle's lifetime, providing graphical history, alerts for significant events, and predictive analytics for future changes, allowing users to compare valuations and loan values, and optimize sale or trade-in decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If vehicle scores are calculated only once at a point in time, then the system is simple and quick, but the user cannot determine vehicle longevity, optimal sale time, or future value changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle history informationVSAvoidtime to obtain comprehensive vehicle analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating vehicle scores at multiple points in time (past, present, and projected future) before the user makes decisions. This allows the user to see the complete trajectory of vehicle value degradation and make informed decisions about optimal sale timing without needing to wait for future actual scores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback by showing users the complete score trajectory over time and alerting them to significant events that affect the score. This feedback loop enables users to understand how their vehicle compares to others over time and identifies optimal moments for sale or trade-in based on projected future scores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If the system provides detailed historical and predictive data, then users can make informed decisions about vehicle longevity and sale timing, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle score trajectory informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the vehicle score analysis into distinct components: historical score calculation, score trajectory projection, event-based alerts, and valuation comparison. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and reduces overall system complexity by modularizing the data processing tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by projecting vehicle scores under different future scenarios (e.g., continued use, premature sale, trade-in timing). This allows the system to provide multiple potential outcomes without requiring complex real-time calculations, simplifying the system while providing comprehensive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If the system calculates and tracks vehicle scores continuously throughout the vehicle's lifetime, then users receive comprehensive historical and predictive data, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete vehicle score historyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary score calculations at key milestones (vehicle acquisition, major events, projected future points) rather than continuously. This preliminary action approach provides comprehensive historical and predictive data while significantly reducing computational energy compared to continuous real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic action by calculating and updating vehicle scores at regular intervals or triggered by specific events (accidents, maintenance, time-based milestones). This periodic approach provides complete score trajectory information while optimizing computational resource usage by avoiding unnecessary continuous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If the system provides alerts for specific vehicle events, then users receive timely notifications about critical events, but the system must monitor and process more data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent notification reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by monitoring for specific high-impact events (accidents, flood damage, title branding, registration changes) rather than all possible vehicle events. This focused monitoring approach ensures reliable alerts for critical events while reducing the complexity of data processing by excluding less significant events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9076276B1System and method for monitoring and predicting vehicle attributes
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC
  • US9076276B1 patent drawing
  • US9076276B1 patent drawing
  • US9076276B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the system and method described herein provides a vehicle monitoring system that gathers reported data on a selected vehicle and alerts a user to selected events reported for that vehicle. In an embodiment, vehicle attributes are processed into a score for the vehicle, such as representing the likely life remaining, and changes in a score trigger alerts to the user.