Automated Vehicle Seat Replacement After Collision Damage Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle owners face challenges in accurately determining whether a vehicle seat is safe for use after a collision, leading to potential risks due to the manual evaluation methods that are often inaccurate and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system utilizing sensors, processors, and communication networks to automatically evaluate vehicle seat conditions post-collision, analyzing data from collision, seat, and vehicle sensors to generate a recommendation for replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual evaluation methods are used to determine vehicle seat safety after collision, then vehicle owners can assess seat condition, but the evaluation accuracy is poor and may lead to inappropriate usage of damaged seats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat safety evaluation accuracyVSAvoidseat usage safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated sensor-based evaluation system. Sensors detect collision forces, airbag deployment, and seat movement, converting physical collision events into measurable data that objectively determines seat safety, eliminating the imprecision of human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated evaluation system between the collision event and the seat safety determination. This intermediary processes sensor data from multiple sources (collision sensors, airbag sensors, seat position sensors) to provide an objective safety assessment, mediating between the physical collision and the decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual evaluation methods are used to assess vehicle seat condition after collision, then vehicle owners can make decisions about seat usage, but the evaluation process is inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for seat evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation by continuously monitoring seat position and collision parameters before the owner needs to make a decision. Sensors are already in place and actively collecting data, so when a collision occurs, the evaluation can begin immediately without requiring the owner to manually inspect the seat first.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated sensor system replaces the time-consuming manual inspection process. Instead of requiring the owner to visually examine the seat, feel for abnormalities, and consult manuals, the system automatically processes sensor data and provides immediate safety recommendations, dramatically reducing evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If automated sensor systems are implemented to evaluate vehicle seat safety, then evaluation accuracy and efficiency are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat safety evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages existing multi-functional vehicle components and sensors that serve multiple purposes. Collision sensors used for airbag deployment are also used for seat safety evaluation; seat position sensors used for comfort adjustment are reused for detecting abnormal seat movement during collision. This universal use of existing components minimizes additional hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the seat safety evaluation function with existing vehicle safety systems. By combining data from collision sensors, airbag sensors, and seat position sensors into a unified evaluation algorithm, the system achieves comprehensive monitoring without requiring separate dedicated hardware for each function, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12469279B2Methods and systems for automated vehicle seat replacement
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US12469279B2 patent drawing
  • US12469279B2 patent drawing
  • US12469279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for automatically evaluating a vehicle seat replacement after a vehicle collision. Upon detecting a vehicle collision is detected, obtaining vehicle seat condition data from vehicle seat sensors and vehicle condition data from vehicle sensors. Analyzing the vehicle seat condition data and/or the vehicle condition data to detect one or more collision conditions indicating (i) the vehicle is not drivable, (ii) a vehicle door proximate the vehicle seat is damaged, (iii) an airbag of the vehicle is deployed, and/or (iv) the vehicle seat is visibly damaged. In response to detecting the one or more collision conditions, generating a recommendation to replace the vehicle seat and providing the recommendation to a user device.